PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JHBSX vs. JVMIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JHBSX vs. JVMIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JHBSX achieves a 0.80% return, which is significantly lower than JVMIX's 11.90% return. Over the past 10 years, JHBSX has underperformed JVMIX with an annualized return of 2.32%, while JVMIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.93% annualized return.


JHBSX

1D
0.07%
1M
0.38%
6M
0.88%
YTD
0.80%
1Y
4.72%
3Y*
4.47%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
2.32%

JVMIX

1D
0.75%
1M
3.29%
6M
11.01%
YTD
11.90%
1Y
14.86%
3Y*
14.18%
5Y*
9.33%
10Y*
10.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JHBSX vs. JVMIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JHBSX
John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6
0.80%7.79%2.10%5.10%-14.95%-0.31%10.74%10.52%-0.73%5.38%
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
11.90%11.28%10.46%16.64%-7.09%26.85%5.90%30.13%-14.90%15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between JHBSX and JVMIX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.28

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.18

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 31, 2011

-0.04

The correlation between JHBSX and JVMIX shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JHBSX vs. JVMIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JHBSX
JHBSX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
JHBSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JHBSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
JHBSX Omega Ratio Rank: 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
JHBSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
JHBSX Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank

JVMIX
JVMIX Risk / Return Rank: 3232
Overall Rank
JVMIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3131
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JVMIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
JVMIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
JVMIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3636
Calmar Ratio Rank
JVMIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3333
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JHBSX vs. JVMIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) and John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JHBSXJVMIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.21

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.22

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

1.82

-0.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.95

5.85

-1.89

JHBSX vs. JVMIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JHBSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.11, which is comparable to the JVMIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JHBSX and JVMIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JHBSX vs. JVMIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JHBSX drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, smaller than the maximum JVMIX drawdown of -67.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHBSX and JVMIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JHBSXJVMIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.78%

-67.04%

+47.26%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-8.57%

+5.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.35%

-21.13%

+13.78%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.78%

-21.13%

+1.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-19.78%

-42.64%

+22.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.84%

0.00%

-1.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.67%

-13.33%

+9.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.13%

2.67%

-1.54%

Volatility

JHBSX vs. JVMIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) is 1.14%, while John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I (JVMIX) has a volatility of 3.36%. This indicates that JHBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JVMIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JHBSXJVMIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.14%

3.36%

-2.22%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.09%

9.35%

-6.26%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.99%

12.88%

-8.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.93%

18.34%

-12.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

4.97%

20.22%

-15.25%

JHBSX vs. JVMIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JHBSX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JVMIX's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

JHBSX vs. JVMIX - Dividend Comparison

JHBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.73%, less than JVMIX's 8.26% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JHBSX
John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6
4.73%4.65%4.20%2.78%3.31%3.67%5.89%4.15%3.93%3.65%3.62%3.92%
JVMIX
John Hancock Funds Disciplined Value Mid Cap Fund Class I
8.26%9.24%12.05%4.02%5.27%6.67%1.13%2.40%13.85%5.94%1.91%5.88%

Frequently Asked Questions


JHBSX and JVMIX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JVMIX has higher volatility (3.36%) compared to JHBSX (1.14%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHBSX dropped -19.78% vs JVMIX's -67.04%.

JVMIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.21 vs 1.11), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JHBSX and JVMIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer