JHBSX vs. JCCIX
JHBSX (John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6) and JCCIX (John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund) are both mutual funds - JHBSX is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by John Hancock, while JCCIX is a Small Cap Blend Equities fund managed by John Hancock. Over the past 10 years, JHBSX returned 2.42%/yr vs 10.86%/yr for JCCIX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JHBSX charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.98%/yr for JCCIX.
Performance
JHBSX vs. JCCIX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHBSX achieves a 0.57% return, which is significantly lower than JCCIX's 22.57% return. Over the past 10 years, JHBSX has underperformed JCCIX with an annualized return of 2.42%, while JCCIX has yielded a comparatively higher 10.86% annualized return.
JHBSX
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- 0.98%
- YTD
- 0.57%
- 6M
- 1.11%
- 1Y
- 5.57%
- 3Y*
- 4.33%
- 5Y*
- -0.09%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
JCCIX
- 1D
- 1.96%
- 1M
- 5.27%
- YTD
- 22.57%
- 6M
- 19.96%
- 1Y
- 32.59%
- 3Y*
- 12.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.66%
- 10Y*
- 10.86%
JHBSX vs. JCCIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHBSX John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 | 0.57% | 7.79% | 2.10% | 5.10% | -14.95% | -0.31% | 10.74% | 10.52% | -0.73% | 5.38% |
JCCIX John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund | 22.57% | -1.90% | 10.62% | 16.52% | -19.09% | 24.10% | 25.99% | 26.79% | -18.28% | 16.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between JHBSX and JCCIX is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.06 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 23, 2013 | 0.01 |
Over the past year, JHBSX and JCCIX have become more correlated (0.34) than their long-term average of 0.01, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JHBSX vs. JCCIX — Risk / Return Rank
JHBSX
JCCIX
JHBSX vs. JCCIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) and John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JHBSX | JCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.25 | 1.30 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.73 | 3.13 | -1.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.03 | 10.01 | -4.99 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JHBSX vs. JCCIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHBSX drawdown since its inception was -19.78%, smaller than the maximum JCCIX drawdown of -38.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHBSX and JCCIX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHBSX | JCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -19.78% | -38.69% | +18.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.24% | -10.42% | +7.18% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.35% | -27.47% | +20.12% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.78% | -27.47% | +7.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -19.78% | -38.69% | +18.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.07% | 0.00% | -2.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.67% | -7.58% | +3.91% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.11% | 3.25% | -2.14% |
Volatility
JHBSX vs. JCCIX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 (JHBSX) is 1.27%, while John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund (JCCIX) has a volatility of 6.40%. This indicates that JHBSX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JCCIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JHBSX | JCCIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.27% | 6.40% | -5.13% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 3.07% | 13.45% | -10.38% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.05% | 18.87% | -14.82% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.93% | 21.69% | -15.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.97% | 21.53% | -16.56% |
JHBSX vs. JCCIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHBSX has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than JCCIX's 0.98% expense ratio.
Dividends
JHBSX vs. JCCIX - Dividend Comparison
JHBSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, more than JCCIX's 3.70% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCCIX John Hancock Small Cap Core Fund | 3.70% | 4.53% | 0.96% | 0.83% | 0.99% | 12.20% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 5.55% | 11.90% | 0.73% | 1.07% |
JHBSX John Hancock Bond Fund Class R6 | 4.72% | 4.65% | 4.20% | 2.78% | 3.31% | 3.67% | 5.89% | 4.15% | 3.93% | 3.65% | 3.62% | 3.92% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JHBSX and JCCIX have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JCCIX has higher volatility (6.40%) compared to JHBSX (1.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JHBSX dropped -19.78% vs JCCIX's -38.69%.
JCCIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.73 vs 1.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JHBSX and JCCIX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer