JHAIX vs. TAGRX
Compare and contrast key facts about JHancock Multi-Asset Absolute Return Fund (JHAIX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX).
JHAIX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Dec 18, 2011. TAGRX is managed by John Hancock. It was launched on Oct 1, 1984.
Performance
JHAIX vs. TAGRX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JHAIX vs. TAGRX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHAIX JHancock Multi-Asset Absolute Return Fund | -3.35% | 4.47% | 3.85% | 4.88% | -5.30% | 11.80% | 2.10% | 9.39% | -5.13% | 3.75% |
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | -8.29% | 9.98% | 21.14% | 32.23% | -24.86% | 29.16% | 20.55% | 35.06% | -14.09% | 19.63% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JHAIX achieves a -3.35% return, which is significantly higher than TAGRX's -8.29% return. Over the past 10 years, JHAIX has underperformed TAGRX with an annualized return of 2.59%, while TAGRX has yielded a comparatively higher 11.59% annualized return.
JHAIX
- 1D
- 1.27%
- 1M
- -5.11%
- YTD
- -3.35%
- 6M
- -3.88%
- 1Y
- -0.57%
- 3Y*
- 2.24%
- 5Y*
- 2.42%
- 10Y*
- 2.59%
TAGRX
- 1D
- 2.80%
- 1M
- -5.72%
- YTD
- -8.29%
- 6M
- -6.58%
- 1Y
- 7.27%
- 3Y*
- 12.77%
- 5Y*
- 7.23%
- 10Y*
- 11.59%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JHAIX vs. TAGRX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JHAIX has a 1.26% expense ratio, which is higher than TAGRX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JHAIX vs. TAGRX — Risk / Return Rank
JHAIX
TAGRX
JHAIX vs. TAGRX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JHancock Multi-Asset Absolute Return Fund (JHAIX) and John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JHAIX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.04 | 0.40 | -0.44 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.00 | 0.70 | -0.70 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.10 | -0.10 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.03 | 0.56 | -0.54 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.09 | 1.91 | -1.82 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JHAIX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.04 | 0.40 | -0.44 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | 0.36 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 | 0.57 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.49 | 0.46 | +0.03 |
Correlation
The correlation between JHAIX and TAGRX is 0.58, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
JHAIX vs. TAGRX - Dividend Comparison
JHAIX has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TAGRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 13.18%.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JHAIX JHancock Multi-Asset Absolute Return Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.84% | 0.00% | 3.45% | 0.00% | 0.80% | 17.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 6.92% |
TAGRX John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund | 13.18% | 12.09% | 13.00% | 6.67% | 6.76% | 7.82% | 0.30% | 0.53% | 14.05% | 8.22% | 2.96% | 1.22% |
Drawdowns
JHAIX vs. TAGRX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JHAIX drawdown since its inception was -10.61%, smaller than the maximum TAGRX drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JHAIX and TAGRX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JHAIX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.61% | -58.45% | +47.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.24% | -14.04% | +6.80% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.61% | -29.10% | +18.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -10.61% | -36.96% | +26.35% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.88% | -11.64% | +5.76% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.69% | -11.57% | +8.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.13% | 4.13% | -2.00% |
Volatility
JHAIX vs. TAGRX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JHancock Multi-Asset Absolute Return Fund (JHAIX) is 3.60%, while John Hancock Fundamental Large Cap Core Fund (TAGRX) has a volatility of 5.19%. This indicates that JHAIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TAGRX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JHAIX | TAGRX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.60% | 5.19% | -1.59% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.13% | 10.11% | -3.98% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.64% | 18.91% | -10.27% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.04% | 20.21% | -13.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.41% | 20.50% | -14.09% |