PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGYH.L vs. JNKS.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGYH.L vs. JNKS.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF (acc) (JGYH.L) and SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGYH.L achieves a 1.97% return, which is significantly higher than JNKS.L's 1.56% return.


JGYH.L

1D
0.17%
1M
1.39%
YTD
1.97%
6M
2.21%
1Y
9.59%
3Y*
6.40%
5Y*
4.89%
10Y*

JNKS.L

1D
0.26%
1M
1.60%
YTD
1.56%
6M
1.26%
1Y
7.49%
3Y*
6.17%
5Y*
5.27%
10Y*
5.75%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGYH.L vs. JNKS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JGYH.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF (acc)
1.97%4.09%7.92%5.18%0.63%3.10%-0.09%
JNKS.L
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD
1.56%0.31%11.61%6.25%0.20%6.02%-0.71%

Correlation

The correlation between JGYH.L and JNKS.L is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.90

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 12, 2020

0.88

The correlation between JGYH.L and JNKS.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGYH.L vs. JNKS.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGYH.L
JGYH.L Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
JGYH.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGYH.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGYH.L Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
JGYH.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGYH.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

JNKS.L
JNKS.L Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
JNKS.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
JNKS.L Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGYH.L vs. JNKS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF (acc) (JGYH.L) and SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JGYH.LJNKS.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.97

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.22

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.97

1.98

+1.99

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.86

5.20

+6.66

JGYH.L vs. JNKS.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGYH.L Sharpe Ratio is 1.93, which is higher than the JNKS.L Sharpe Ratio of 1.25. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGYH.L and JNKS.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JGYH.LJNKS.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.93

1.25

+0.68

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.71

0.67

+0.03

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.62

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.42

0.64

-0.22

Drawdowns

JGYH.L vs. JNKS.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGYH.L drawdown since its inception was -12.24%, smaller than the maximum JNKS.L drawdown of -14.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGYH.L and JNKS.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGYH.LJNKS.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-12.24%

-14.18%

+1.94%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.41%

-3.78%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.56%

-10.35%

+2.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-7.75%

-10.35%

+2.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-14.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-1.74%

+1.74%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.52%

-3.66%

+1.14%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.81%

1.44%

-0.63%

Volatility

JGYH.L vs. JNKS.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF (acc) (JGYH.L) is 1.22%, while SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD (JNKS.L) has a volatility of 1.55%. This indicates that JGYH.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than JNKS.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGYH.LJNKS.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.22%

1.55%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.56%

4.27%

-0.71%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.94%

5.95%

-1.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

6.92%

7.81%

-0.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.60%

9.29%

-0.69%

JGYH.L vs. JNKS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGYH.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JNKS.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGYH.L vs. JNKS.L - Dividend Comparison

JGYH.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while JNKS.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.20%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JGYH.L
JPMorgan Global High Yield Corporate Bond Multi-Factor UCITS ETF (acc)
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JNKS.L
SPDR Bloomberg SASB U.S. High Yield Corporate ESG UCITS ETF Dist USD
7.20%7.46%7.06%6.78%5.43%5.30%5.84%5.85%4.96%6.39%4.98%5.29%

Frequently Asked Questions


JGYH.L and JNKS.L have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JNKS.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JNKS.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JGYH.L.

JGYH.L tracks ICE BofA Gbl HY Constnd TR USD, while JNKS.L tracks Bloomberg US Corporate High Yield TR USD. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JGYH.L and 0.30% for JNKS.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGYH.L and JNKS.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer