JGRW vs. SCHK

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JGRW (Jensen Quality Growth ETF) and SCHK (Schwab 1000 Index ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. JGRW is actively managed, while SCHK is passively managed. Over the past year, JGRW returned 3.28% vs 26.58% for SCHK. Their correlation of 0.84 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JGRW charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHK.

Performance

JGRW vs. SCHK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGRW achieves a -2.19% return, which is significantly lower than SCHK's 10.10% return.

JGRW

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -1.82%
• YTD: -2.19%
• 6M: -2.24%
• 1Y: 3.28%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHK

• 1D: -0.33%
• 1M: 0.47%
• YTD: 10.10%
• 6M: 9.43%
• 1Y: 26.58%
• 3Y*: 21.32%
• 5Y*: 12.78%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGRW vs. SCHK - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JGRW Jensen Quality Growth ETF	-2.19%	5.07%	2.56%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	10.10%	17.23%	11.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JGRW and SCHK is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.85
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 13, 2024	0.84

The correlation between JGRW and SCHK has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JGRW vs. SCHK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGRW

JGRW Risk / Return Rank: 11
JGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 12
JGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
JGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 11
JGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
JGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 13

SCHK

SCHK Risk / Return Rank: 66
SCHK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
SCHK Sortino Ratio Rank: 63
SCHK Omega Ratio Rank: 65
SCHK Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SCHK Martin Ratio Rank: 73

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGRW vs. SCHK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) and Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JGRW	SCHK	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.27	2.10	-1.82
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.46	2.84	-2.38
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.06	1.38	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.23	2.98	-2.75
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.80	13.32	-12.52

JGRW vs. SCHK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGRW Sharpe Ratio is 0.27, which is lower than the SCHK Sharpe Ratio of 2.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGRW and SCHK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JGRW vs. SCHK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGRW drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, smaller than the maximum SCHK drawdown of -34.80%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRW and SCHK.

Drawdown Indicators

	JGRW	SCHK	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.64%	-34.80%	+20.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.36%	-8.97%	-5.39%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-19.21%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-25.44%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.96%	-1.59%	-2.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.96%	-5.16%	+2.20%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.09%	2.00%	+2.09%

Volatility

JGRW vs. SCHK - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) is 4.30%, while Schwab 1000 Index ETF (SCHK) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that JGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JGRW	SCHK	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.30%	4.74%	-0.44%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.09%	10.01%	+0.08%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.12%	12.77%	-0.65%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.45%	17.33%	-2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.45%	19.12%	-4.67%

JGRW vs. SCHK - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGRW has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHK's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

JGRW vs. SCHK - Dividend Comparison

JGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.39%, less than SCHK's 1.01% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
JGRW Jensen Quality Growth ETF	0.39%	0.54%	0.24%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHK Schwab 1000 Index ETF	1.01%	1.09%	1.20%	1.38%	1.57%	1.17%	1.58%	1.82%	1.80%	0.31%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JGRW and SCHK in my portfolio?

JGRW and SCHK have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JGRW or SCHK?

SCHK has higher volatility (4.74%) compared to JGRW (4.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGRW dropped -14.64% vs SCHK's -34.80%.

Which ETF is better, JGRW or SCHK?

On 1-year performance, SCHK leads with 26.58% vs 3.28% for JGRW. On fees, SCHK is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, JGRW has been the lower-risk option at 4.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JGRW or SCHK?

Over the 1-year period, SCHK has performed better with a 26.58% return vs 3.28%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JGRW or SCHK?

SCHK is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.57% for JGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JGRW or SCHK?

SCHK has the higher dividend yield at 1.01%, compared with 0.39% for JGRW.

What is the main difference between JGRW and SCHK?

They also come from different issuers: Jensen and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for JGRW and 0.03% for SCHK.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SCHK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.