JGRW vs. BUFH
JGRW (Jensen Quality Growth ETF) and BUFH (FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JGRW is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Jensen, while BUFH is a Defined Outcome fund managed by First Trust. A 0.67 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JGRW charges 0.57%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for BUFH.
Performance
JGRW vs. BUFH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGRW achieves a -1.11% return, which is significantly lower than BUFH's 2.21% return.
JGRW
- 1D
- -1.91%
- 1M
- -0.04%
- YTD
- -1.11%
- 6M
- -1.44%
- 1Y
- 2.08%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUFH
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.26%
- YTD
- 2.21%
- 6M
- 2.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JGRW vs. BUFH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JGRW Jensen Quality Growth ETF | -1.11% | 3.95% |
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 2.21% | 3.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGRW and BUFH is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025 | 0.67 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGRW vs. BUFH — Risk / Return Rank
JGRW
BUFH
JGRW vs. BUFH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jensen Quality Growth ETF (JGRW) and FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF (BUFH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JGRW | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.51 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JGRW | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.22 | 2.76 | -2.54 |
Drawdowns
JGRW vs. BUFH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGRW drawdown since its inception was -14.64%, which is greater than BUFH's maximum drawdown of -1.53%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRW and BUFH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGRW | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.64% | -1.53% | -13.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.91% | -0.28% | -2.63% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.97% | -0.18% | -2.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.06% | — | — |
Volatility
JGRW vs. BUFH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGRW | BUFH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.23% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.58% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.84% | 2.38% | +9.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 2.38% | +12.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.39% | 2.38% | +12.01% |
JGRW vs. BUFH - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGRW has a 0.57% expense ratio, which is lower than BUFH's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
JGRW vs. BUFH - Dividend Comparison
JGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.46%, while BUFH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BUFH FT Vest Laddered Max Buffer ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JGRW Jensen Quality Growth ETF | 0.46% | 0.54% | 0.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JGRW and BUFH have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JGRW is cheaper at 0.57% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JGRW is cheaper with a 0.57% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for BUFH.
JGRW has the higher dividend yield at 0.46%, compared with 0.00% for BUFH.
JGRW is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BUFH is Defined Outcome. They also come from different issuers: Jensen and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.57% for JGRW and 0.95% for BUFH.
Find the right allocation for JGRW and BUFH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer