JGRO vs. ILCG
JGRO (JPMorgan Active Growth ETF) and ILCG (iShares Morningstar Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. JGRO is actively managed, while ILCG is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JGRO returned 21.66%/yr vs 25.09%/yr for ILCG. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JGRO charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for ILCG.
Performance
JGRO vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGRO achieves a 3.00% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 10.48% return.
JGRO
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- -0.87%
- YTD
- 3.00%
- 6M
- 1.07%
- 1Y
- 16.04%
- 3Y*
- 21.66%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ILCG
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- 0.01%
- YTD
- 10.48%
- 6M
- 9.79%
- 1Y
- 24.11%
- 3Y*
- 25.09%
- 5Y*
- 14.03%
- 10Y*
- 17.83%
JGRO vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF | 3.00% | 14.71% | 32.77% | 37.74% | -10.43% |
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 10.48% | 16.71% | 32.82% | 40.41% | -14.69% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGRO and ILCG is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.98 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022 | 0.98 |
The correlation between JGRO and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.97 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.
JGRO vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JGRO
ILCG
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Utilities
Technology
JGRO
ILCG
Communication Services
JGRO
ILCG
Consumer Cyclical
JGRO
ILCG
Healthcare
JGRO
ILCG
Industrials
JGRO
ILCG
Financial Services
JGRO
ILCG
Consumer Defensive
JGRO
ILCG
Energy
JGRO
ILCG
Basic Materials
JGRO
ILCG
Real Estate
JGRO
ILCG
Utilities
JGRO
ILCG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGRO vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank
JGRO
ILCG
JGRO vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JGRO | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.50 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.26 | -0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.98 | 1.55 | -0.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.95 | 5.43 | -2.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JGRO | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.02 | 1.44 | -0.42 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.64 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.83 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.96 | 0.58 | +0.38 |
Drawdowns
JGRO vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGRO drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRO and ILCG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGRO | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -22.70% | -52.98% | +30.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.44% | -15.65% | -0.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -22.70% | -23.10% | +0.40% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -35.38% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.94% | -4.48% | +0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.85% | -8.22% | +3.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.45% | 4.45% | +1.00% |
Volatility
JGRO vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) is 4.94%, while iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) has a volatility of 6.01%. This indicates that JGRO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGRO | ILCG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.94% | 6.01% | -1.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.98% | 13.55% | -1.57% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.82% | 16.85% | -1.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 22.08% | -2.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.94% | 21.58% | -1.64% |
JGRO vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGRO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.
Dividends
JGRO vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison
JGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, less than ILCG's 0.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ILCG iShares Morningstar Growth ETF | 0.42% | 0.47% | 0.50% | 0.69% | 0.75% | 0.34% | 0.28% | 0.54% | 0.81% | 0.89% | 0.95% | 0.99% |
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.10% | 0.17% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, JGRO and ILCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
ILCG has higher volatility (6.01%) compared to JGRO (4.94%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGRO dropped -22.70% vs ILCG's -52.98%.
On 3-year performance, ILCG leads with 25.09% vs 21.66% for JGRO. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, JGRO has been the lower-risk option at 4.94%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 25.09% return vs 21.66%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JGRO.
ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.15% for JGRO.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JGRO and 0.04% for ILCG.
ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JGRO and ILCG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer