PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGRO vs. ILCG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGRO vs. ILCG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JGRO achieves a -0.15% return, which is significantly lower than ILCG's 8.39% return.


JGRO

1D
-1.12%
1M
-3.56%
6M
0.27%
YTD
-0.15%
1Y
6.54%
3Y*
17.01%
5Y*
10Y*

ILCG

1D
-1.28%
1M
-2.03%
6M
7.44%
YTD
8.39%
1Y
14.48%
3Y*
21.04%
5Y*
12.12%
10Y*
17.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGRO vs. ILCG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
-0.15%14.71%32.77%37.74%-10.43%
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
8.39%16.71%32.82%40.41%-14.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JGRO and ILCG is 0.98 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.98

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 9, 2022

0.98

The correlation between JGRO and ILCG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

JGRO vs. ILCG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JGRO
ILCG

Technology

47.2%
53.1%

Communication Services

12.8%
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

10.8%
10.1%

Healthcare

9.9%
5.2%

Industrials

8.7%
7.7%

Financial Services

4.8%
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

3.7%
1.4%

Energy

1.6%
0.4%

Basic Materials

0.3%
1.0%

Real Estate

0.2%
1.3%

Utilities

0.1%
0.7%

Technology

JGRO
47.2%
ILCG
53.1%

Communication Services

JGRO
12.8%
ILCG
13.5%

Consumer Cyclical

JGRO
10.8%
ILCG
10.1%

Healthcare

JGRO
9.9%
ILCG
5.2%

Industrials

JGRO
8.7%
ILCG
7.7%

Financial Services

JGRO
4.8%
ILCG
5.5%

Consumer Defensive

JGRO
3.7%
ILCG
1.4%

Energy

JGRO
1.6%
ILCG
0.4%

Basic Materials

JGRO
0.3%
ILCG
1.0%

Real Estate

JGRO
0.2%
ILCG
1.3%

Utilities

JGRO
0.1%
ILCG
0.7%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGRO vs. ILCG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGRO
JGRO Risk / Return Rank: 1616
Overall Rank
JGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1616
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
JGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

ILCG
ILCG Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
ILCG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ILCG Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
ILCG Omega Ratio Rank: 2525
Omega Ratio Rank
ILCG Calmar Ratio Rank: 2424
Calmar Ratio Rank
ILCG Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGRO vs. ILCG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JGROILCGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.42

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.54

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.15

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

0.93

-0.53

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.17

3.09

-1.92

JGRO vs. ILCG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGRO Sharpe Ratio is 0.38, which is lower than the ILCG Sharpe Ratio of 0.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGRO and ILCG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JGRO vs. ILCG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGRO drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, smaller than the maximum ILCG drawdown of -52.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRO and ILCG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGROILCGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-22.70%

-52.98%

+30.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-16.44%

-15.65%

-0.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.70%

-23.10%

+0.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.38%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.87%

-6.29%

-0.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.82%

-8.20%

+3.38%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.61%

4.70%

+0.91%

Volatility

JGRO vs. ILCG - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) has a higher volatility of 7.16% compared to iShares Morningstar Growth ETF (ILCG) at 6.60%. This indicates that JGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ILCG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGROILCGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.16%

6.60%

+0.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.93%

15.23%

-1.30%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.41%

18.24%

-0.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.09%

22.32%

-2.23%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.09%

21.65%

-1.56%

JGRO vs. ILCG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGRO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than ILCG's 0.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGRO vs. ILCG - Dividend Comparison

JGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.16%, less than ILCG's 0.42% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
ILCG
iShares Morningstar Growth ETF
0.42%0.47%0.50%0.69%0.75%0.34%0.28%0.54%0.81%0.89%0.95%0.99%
JGRO
JPMorgan Active Growth ETF
0.16%0.16%0.10%0.17%0.16%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.98, JGRO and ILCG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JGRO has higher volatility (7.16%) compared to ILCG (6.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGRO dropped -22.70% vs ILCG's -52.98%.

On 3-year performance, ILCG leads with 21.04% vs 17.01% for JGRO. On fees, ILCG is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, ILCG has been the lower-risk option at 6.60%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, ILCG has performed better with a 21.04% return vs 17.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

ILCG is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JGRO.

ILCG has the higher dividend yield at 0.42%, compared with 0.16% for JGRO.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JGRO and 0.04% for ILCG.

ILCG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.80 vs 0.38), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGRO and ILCG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer