JGRO vs. GRW

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

JGRO (JPMorgan Active Growth ETF) and GRW (TCW Durable Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. Both are actively managed. A 0.71 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JGRO charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for GRW.

Performance

JGRO vs. GRW - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JGRO

• 1D: -3.52%
• 1M: -1.28%
• YTD: 2.63%
• 6M: 0.75%
• 1Y: 16.59%
• 3Y*: 21.39%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GRW

• 1D: -2.03%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JGRO vs. GRW - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF	-3.42%
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	-0.60%

Correlation

The correlation between JGRO and GRW is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.71

JGRO vs. GRW - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JGRO	GRW
Technology	42.0%	26.6%
Communication Services	13.9%	9.1%
Consumer Cyclical	11.7%	8.3%
Healthcare	11.0%	4.1%
Industrials	9.2%	38.1%
Financial Services	5.6%	9.8%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	-
Energy	1.9%	-
Basic Materials	0.3%	4.0%
Real Estate	0.3%	-
Utilities	0.1%	-

Return for Risk

JGRO vs. GRW — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JGRO

JGRO Risk / Return Rank: 27
JGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 30
JGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 28
JGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 29
JGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
JGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 24

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JGRO vs. GRW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Growth ETF (JGRO) and TCW Durable Growth ETF (GRW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JGRO	GRW	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.05	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.48	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.19	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.01	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	3.05	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JGRO	GRW	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.05	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	-1.44	+2.39

Drawdowns

JGRO vs. GRW - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGRO drawdown since its inception was -22.70%, which is greater than GRW's maximum drawdown of -2.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGRO and GRW.

Drawdown Indicators

	JGRO	GRW	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-22.70%	-2.30%	-20.40%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.44%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-22.70%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.28%	-2.30%	-1.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.85%	-0.53%	-4.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.45%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JGRO	GRW	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.95%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.98%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.81%	17.04%	-1.23%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.95%	17.04%	+2.91%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.95%	17.04%	+2.91%

JGRO vs. GRW - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGRO has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is lower than GRW's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

JGRO vs. GRW - Dividend Comparison

JGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.15%, while GRW has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
GRW TCW Durable Growth ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JGRO JPMorgan Active Growth ETF	0.15%	0.16%	0.10%	0.17%	0.16%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JGRO and GRW in my portfolio?

JGRO and GRW have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JGRO or GRW?

On fees, JGRO is cheaper at 0.44% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JGRO or GRW?

JGRO is cheaper with a 0.44% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for GRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JGRO or GRW?

JGRO has the higher dividend yield at 0.15%, compared with 0.00% for GRW.

What is the main difference between JGRO and GRW?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and TCW. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JGRO and 0.75% for GRW.