PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JGLTX vs. JATIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JGLTX vs. JATIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I (JATIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JGLTX having a 22.16% return and JATIX slightly higher at 22.67%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with JGLTX having a 22.60% annualized return and JATIX not far behind at 22.44%.


JGLTX

1D
1.15%
1M
-2.86%
6M
23.13%
YTD
22.16%
1Y
29.06%
3Y*
31.31%
5Y*
14.90%
10Y*
22.60%
ALL TIME*
8.42%

JATIX

1D
1.15%
1M
-2.87%
6M
23.68%
YTD
22.67%
1Y
29.56%
3Y*
31.51%
5Y*
14.60%
10Y*
22.44%
ALL TIME*
20.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JGLTX vs. JATIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
22.16%25.19%32.10%54.55%-36.42%18.28%50.42%45.29%1.17%45.17%
JATIX
Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I
22.67%25.04%32.38%55.38%-37.60%17.57%51.25%45.27%0.97%44.79%

Correlation

The correlation between JGLTX and JATIX is 1.00 - they have historically moved very closely together. At this level, their price movements offset little of one another.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

1.00

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

1.00

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

1.00

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

1.00

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 6, 2009

1.00

The correlation between JGLTX and JATIX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 1.00 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JGLTX vs. JATIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JGLTX
JGLTX Risk / Return Rank: 3333
Overall Rank
JGLTX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JGLTX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
JGLTX Omega Ratio Rank: 3232
Omega Ratio Rank
JGLTX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
JGLTX Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

JATIX
JATIX Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
JATIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JATIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3232
Sortino Ratio Rank
JATIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3333
Omega Ratio Rank
JATIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
JATIX Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JGLTX vs. JATIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I (JATIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JGLTXJATIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.02

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.02

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.22

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.69

1.74

-0.05

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.58

5.68

-0.10

JGLTX vs. JATIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JGLTX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is comparable to the JATIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JGLTX and JATIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JGLTX vs. JATIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JGLTX drawdown since its inception was -81.78%, which is greater than JATIX's maximum drawdown of -46.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLTX and JATIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JGLTXJATIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-81.78%

-46.43%

-35.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.76%

-18.53%

-0.23%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.72%

-23.92%

+0.20%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-45.18%

-46.43%

+1.25%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-45.18%

-46.43%

+1.25%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.06%

-9.84%

-0.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-36.41%

-6.73%

-29.68%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.68%

5.68%

0.00%

Volatility

JGLTX vs. JATIX - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I (JATIX) have volatilities of 12.24% and 12.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JGLTXJATIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

12.24%

12.15%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.70%

23.67%

+0.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.02%

27.06%

-0.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.23%

27.52%

-0.29%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.04%

25.11%

-0.07%

JGLTX vs. JATIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JGLTX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than JATIX's 0.76% expense ratio.


Dividends

JGLTX vs. JATIX - Dividend Comparison

JGLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.50%, more than JATIX's 10.75% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JATIX
Janus Henderson Global Technology and Innovation Fund Class I
10.75%13.19%11.48%0.76%0.00%15.67%8.94%8.47%6.65%7.41%4.80%7.71%
JGLTX
Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio
11.50%8.98%0.00%0.00%26.96%14.48%7.71%6.81%4.95%5.68%3.71%16.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 1.00, JGLTX and JATIX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

JGLTX has higher volatility (12.24%) compared to JATIX (12.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGLTX dropped -81.78% vs JATIX's -46.43%.

JATIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JGLTX and JATIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer