JGLTX vs. FELAX
Compare and contrast key facts about Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX).
JGLTX is managed by Janus Henderson. It was launched on Jan 17, 2000. FELAX is managed by Fidelity. It was launched on Dec 27, 2000.
Performance
JGLTX vs. FELAX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
JGLTX vs. FELAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | -7.02% | 25.19% | 32.10% | 54.55% | -36.42% | 18.28% | 50.42% | 45.29% | 1.17% | 45.17% |
FELAX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A | 7.43% | 44.88% | 43.74% | 75.08% | -35.07% | 57.50% | 43.57% | 63.76% | -12.76% | 34.12% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGLTX achieves a -7.02% return, which is significantly lower than FELAX's 7.43% return. Over the past 10 years, JGLTX has underperformed FELAX with an annualized return of 20.70%, while FELAX has yielded a comparatively higher 30.52% annualized return.
JGLTX
- 1D
- 3.97%
- 1M
- -7.40%
- YTD
- -7.02%
- 6M
- -6.55%
- 1Y
- 27.79%
- 3Y*
- 24.91%
- 5Y*
- 11.25%
- 10Y*
- 20.70%
FELAX
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- YTD
- 7.43%
- 6M
- 14.34%
- 1Y
- 88.29%
- 3Y*
- 41.26%
- 5Y*
- 28.70%
- 10Y*
- 30.52%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JGLTX vs. FELAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGLTX has a 0.72% expense ratio, which is lower than FELAX's 1.01% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
JGLTX vs. FELAX — Risk / Return Rank
JGLTX
FELAX
JGLTX vs. FELAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) and Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JGLTX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.17 | 2.25 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.74 | 2.85 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.40 | -0.16 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.81 | 5.18 | -3.37 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.15 | 19.59 | -13.44 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JGLTX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.17 | 2.25 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 | 0.76 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.85 | 0.89 | -0.04 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.30 | 0.40 | -0.10 |
Correlation
The correlation between JGLTX and FELAX is 0.87, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
JGLTX vs. FELAX - Dividend Comparison
JGLTX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.66%, more than FELAX's 6.48% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGLTX Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio | 9.66% | 8.98% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 26.96% | 14.48% | 7.71% | 6.81% | 4.95% | 5.68% | 3.71% | 16.11% |
FELAX Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A | 6.48% | 6.96% | 7.02% | 3.40% | 3.32% | 4.34% | 4.51% | 1.00% | 20.15% | 9.67% | 0.36% | 10.71% |
Drawdowns
JGLTX vs. FELAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGLTX drawdown since its inception was -81.78%, which is greater than FELAX's maximum drawdown of -71.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGLTX and FELAX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGLTX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.78% | -71.33% | -10.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.81% | -17.10% | +1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.18% | -46.15% | +0.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.18% | -46.15% | +0.97% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.47% | -8.57% | -3.90% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.82% | -22.02% | -14.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.65% | 4.52% | +0.13% |
Volatility
JGLTX vs. FELAX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Janus Henderson VIT Global Technology and Innovation Portfolio (JGLTX) is 8.22%, while Fidelity Advisor Semiconductors Fund Class A (FELAX) has a volatility of 12.79%. This indicates that JGLTX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FELAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| JGLTX | FELAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.22% | 12.79% | -4.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.11% | 25.67% | -9.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.28% | 40.20% | -14.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.93% | 38.07% | -12.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.31% | 34.41% | -10.10% |