JGH vs. FGUMX
JGH (Nuveen Global High Income Fund) and FGUMX (Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z) are both High Yield Bonds funds. Over the past 5 years, JGH returned 5.81%/yr vs 4.38%/yr for FGUMX. At a 0.47 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JGH charges 1.68%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for FGUMX.
Performance
JGH vs. FGUMX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JGH achieves a 5.15% return, which is significantly higher than FGUMX's 3.48% return.
JGH
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 5.15%
- 6M
- 7.13%
- 1Y
- 10.84%
- 3Y*
- 15.83%
- 5Y*
- 5.81%
- 10Y*
- 8.41%
FGUMX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- 3.48%
- 6M
- 4.20%
- 1Y
- 9.97%
- 3Y*
- 10.21%
- 5Y*
- 4.38%
- 10Y*
- —
JGH vs. FGUMX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JGH Nuveen Global High Income Fund | 5.15% | 8.62% | 15.98% | 20.89% | -21.01% | 10.84% | 2.77% | 30.04% | -4.36% |
FGUMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z | 3.48% | 9.92% | 9.53% | 11.08% | -13.03% | 3.72% | 2.41% | 14.34% | -3.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between JGH and FGUMX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 6, 2018 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JGH vs. FGUMX — Risk / Return Rank
JGH
FGUMX
JGH vs. FGUMX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) and Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JGH | FGUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.61 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | 1.70 | -0.48 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.30 | 4.65 | -3.35 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.16 | 22.17 | -19.01 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JGH | FGUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.06 | 2.99 | -1.92 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | 0.83 | -0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.53 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.41 | 0.75 | -0.34 |
Drawdowns
JGH vs. FGUMX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JGH drawdown since its inception was -43.79%, which is greater than FGUMX's maximum drawdown of -22.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JGH and FGUMX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JGH | FGUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -43.79% | -22.36% | -21.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.37% | -2.21% | -6.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.70% | -4.15% | -9.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.66% | -16.53% | -12.13% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -43.79% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.78% | -0.24% | -0.54% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.00% | -3.49% | -3.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.44% | 0.46% | +2.98% |
Volatility
JGH vs. FGUMX - Volatility Comparison
Nuveen Global High Income Fund (JGH) has a higher volatility of 3.70% compared to Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z (FGUMX) at 1.19%. This indicates that JGH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FGUMX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JGH | FGUMX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.70% | 1.19% | +2.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.25% | 2.69% | +4.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.22% | 3.55% | +6.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.79% | 5.34% | +8.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.88% | 6.38% | +9.50% |
JGH vs. FGUMX - Expense Ratio Comparison
JGH has a 1.68% expense ratio, which is higher than FGUMX's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
JGH vs. FGUMX - Dividend Comparison
JGH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.74%, more than FGUMX's 6.45% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FGUMX Fidelity Advisor High Income Fund Class Z | 6.45% | 6.49% | 6.19% | 5.48% | 3.98% | 4.12% | 4.78% | 5.17% | 0.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JGH Nuveen Global High Income Fund | 9.74% | 9.82% | 9.67% | 10.18% | 12.05% | 8.19% | 7.13% | 7.53% | 9.88% | 8.52% | 9.61% | 11.44% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JGH and FGUMX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JGH has higher volatility (3.70%) compared to FGUMX (1.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JGH dropped -43.79% vs FGUMX's -22.36%.
FGUMX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.99 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JGH and FGUMX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer