JETS vs. HVAC

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JETS (U.S. Global Jets ETF) and HVAC (AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF) are both Industrials Equities funds. JETS is passively managed, while HVAC is actively managed. Over the past year, JETS returned 22.85% vs 59.65% for HVAC. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JETS charges 0.60%/yr vs 1.00%/yr for HVAC.

Performance

JETS vs. HVAC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JETS achieves a -0.86% return, which is significantly lower than HVAC's 36.48% return.

JETS

• 1D: -2.35%
• 1M: 9.48%
• YTD: -0.86%
• 6M: 3.46%
• 1Y: 22.85%
• 3Y*: 14.30%
• 5Y*: 1.37%
• 10Y*: 2.63%

HVAC

• 1D: 1.91%
• 1M: 6.24%
• YTD: 36.48%
• 6M: 32.88%
• 1Y: 59.65%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JETS vs. HVAC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF	-0.86%	8.55%
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF	36.48%	24.04%

Correlation

The correlation between JETS and HVAC is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.50
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 5, 2025	0.56

The correlation between JETS and HVAC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.50 to 0.56 - a consistent structural relationship.

JETS vs. HVAC - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JETS	HVAC
Industrials	88.8%	67.0%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	4.5%
Technology	2.6%	16.9%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	2.8%
Utilities	-	7.4%

Return for Risk

JETS vs. HVAC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JETS

JETS Risk / Return Rank: 21
JETS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
JETS Sortino Ratio Rank: 23
JETS Omega Ratio Rank: 21
JETS Calmar Ratio Rank: 21
JETS Martin Ratio Rank: 20

HVAC

HVAC Risk / Return Rank: 68
HVAC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
HVAC Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
HVAC Omega Ratio Rank: 60
HVAC Calmar Ratio Rank: 79
HVAC Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JETS vs. HVAC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) and AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JETS	HVAC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.70	2.19	-1.49
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.27	2.75	-1.48
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.14	1.36	-0.22
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.95	4.04	-3.09
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	2.44	14.29	-11.86
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JETS vs. HVAC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JETS Sharpe Ratio is 0.70, which is lower than the HVAC Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JETS and HVAC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JETS	HVAC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.70	2.19	-1.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.04	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.08	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	1.67	-1.62

Drawdowns

JETS vs. HVAC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JETS drawdown since its inception was -64.92%, which is greater than HVAC's maximum drawdown of -21.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETS and HVAC.

Drawdown Indicators

	JETS	HVAC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-64.92%	-21.22%	-43.70%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-24.13%	-14.83%	-9.30%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.21%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-44.36%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-64.92%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.40%	-0.60%	-16.80%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-25.19%	-3.95%	-21.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	9.40%	4.19%	+5.21%

Volatility

JETS vs. HVAC - Volatility Comparison

U.S. Global Jets ETF (JETS) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF (HVAC) at 11.09%. This indicates that JETS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HVAC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JETS	HVAC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.74%	11.09%	+0.65%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.23%	22.96%	+1.27%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	32.61%	27.43%	+5.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.27%	29.39%	+2.88%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	34.18%	29.39%	+4.79%

JETS vs. HVAC - Expense Ratio Comparison

JETS has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HVAC's 1.00% expense ratio.

Dividends

JETS vs. HVAC - Dividend Comparison

JETS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.84%, more than HVAC's 0.14% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
HVAC AdvisorShares HVAC and Industrials ETF	0.14%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
JETS U.S. Global Jets ETF	0.84%	0.83%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.67%	0.04%	1.24%	0.09%	1.57%	0.58%	0.17%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JETS and HVAC in my portfolio?

JETS and HVAC have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JETS or HVAC?

JETS has higher volatility (11.74%) compared to HVAC (11.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETS dropped -64.92% vs HVAC's -21.22%.

Which ETF is better, JETS or HVAC?

On 1-year performance, HVAC leads with 59.65% vs 22.85% for JETS. On fees, JETS is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HVAC has been the lower-risk option at 11.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JETS or HVAC?

Over the 1-year period, HVAC has performed better with a 59.65% return vs 22.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JETS or HVAC?

JETS is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for HVAC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JETS or HVAC?

JETS has the higher dividend yield at 0.84%, compared with 0.14% for HVAC.

What is the main difference between JETS and HVAC?

They also come from different issuers: US Global and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for JETS and 1.00% for HVAC.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

HVAC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.19 vs 0.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.