JETD vs. FLYD
JETD (MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN) and FLYD (MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs) are both Inverse Equities funds - JETD tracks the Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%) while FLYD tracks the MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JETD returned -50.36%/yr vs -50.41%/yr for FLYD. A 0.79 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
JETD vs. FLYD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JETD achieves a -46.38% return, which is significantly lower than FLYD's -23.78% return.
JETD
- 1D
- 4.02%
- 1M
- 0.00%
- 6M
- -34.45%
- YTD
- -46.38%
- 1Y
- -64.33%
- 3Y*
- -50.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FLYD
- 1D
- 5.09%
- 1M
- -0.55%
- 6M
- -23.30%
- YTD
- -23.78%
- 1Y
- -35.09%
- 3Y*
- -50.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JETD vs. FLYD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JETD MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN | -46.38% | -59.89% | -51.72% | -1.53% |
FLYD MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs | -23.78% | -60.42% | -54.13% | -32.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between JETD and FLYD is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.79 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 21, 2023 | 0.79 |
The correlation between JETD and FLYD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.79 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JETD vs. FLYD — Risk / Return Rank
JETD
FLYD
JETD vs. FLYD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (JETD) and MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JETD | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.39 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.02 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.85 | 0.97 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | -0.63 | -0.23 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.43 | -1.23 | -0.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JETD vs. FLYD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JETD drawdown since its inception was -95.39%, roughly equal to the maximum FLYD drawdown of -98.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JETD and FLYD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JETD | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.39% | -98.49% | +3.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -75.34% | -56.11% | -19.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -95.39% | -94.73% | -0.66% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -94.42% | -98.24% | +3.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -62.57% | -83.49% | +20.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 45.15% | 28.47% | +16.68% |
Volatility
JETD vs. FLYD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for MAX Airlines -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (JETD) is 16.95%, while MicroSectors Travel -3X Inverse Leveraged ETNs (FLYD) has a volatility of 20.20%. This indicates that JETD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLYD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JETD | FLYD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.95% | 20.20% | -3.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 65.08% | 63.64% | +1.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 75.05% | 75.51% | -0.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 71.33% | 83.52% | -12.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.33% | 83.52% | -12.19% |
JETD vs. FLYD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both JETD and FLYD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
JETD vs. FLYD - Dividend Comparison
Neither JETD nor FLYD has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
JETD and FLYD have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FLYD has higher volatility (20.20%) compared to JETD (16.95%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JETD dropped -95.39% vs FLYD's -98.49%.
On 3-year performance, JETD leads with -50.36% vs -50.41% for FLYD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, JETD has been the lower-risk option at 16.95%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JETD has performed better with a -50.36% return vs -50.41%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JETD and FLYD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
JETD and FLYD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
JETD tracks Prime Airlines Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%), while FLYD tracks MerQube MicroSectors U.S. Travel Index. They also come from different issuers: Max and REX.
FLYD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.47 vs -0.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JETD and FLYD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer