PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JESVX vs. QRSVX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JESVX vs. QRSVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Small Cap Value Trust (JESVX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JESVX having a 24.63% return and QRSVX slightly higher at 25.14%.


JESVX

1D
0.26%
1M
2.13%
6M
18.10%
YTD
24.63%
1Y
30.39%
3Y*
12.65%
5Y*
7.88%
10Y*

QRSVX

1D
-0.17%
1M
-0.75%
6M
20.50%
YTD
25.14%
1Y
31.42%
3Y*
19.63%
5Y*
12.37%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JESVX vs. QRSVX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JESVX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Small Cap Value Trust
24.63%0.13%5.97%14.02%-9.84%26.18%2.65%
QRSVX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
25.14%13.37%10.72%16.04%-9.14%23.16%2.50%

Correlation

The correlation between JESVX and QRSVX is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.62

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 14, 2020

0.86

Over the past year, the correlation between JESVX and QRSVX has dropped to 0.62 - well below their long-term average of 0.86, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JESVX vs. QRSVX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JESVX
JESVX Risk / Return Rank: 7272
Overall Rank
JESVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JESVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
JESVX Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
JESVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
JESVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

QRSVX
QRSVX Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
QRSVX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRSVX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRSVX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
QRSVX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRSVX Martin Ratio Rank: 8989
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JESVX vs. QRSVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Small Cap Value Trust (JESVX) and FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JESVXQRSVXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.35

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.45

3.75

-0.30

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.37

13.17

-1.80

JESVX vs. QRSVX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JESVX Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the QRSVX Sharpe Ratio of 1.96. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JESVX and QRSVX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JESVX vs. QRSVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JESVX drawdown since its inception was -46.09%, which is greater than QRSVX's maximum drawdown of -20.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JESVX and QRSVX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JESVXQRSVXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.09%

-20.59%

-25.50%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.17%

-7.93%

-2.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-26.55%

-18.91%

-7.64%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.55%

-20.59%

-5.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.85%

-1.49%

-1.36%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.98%

-4.81%

-4.17%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.95%

2.25%

+0.70%

Volatility

JESVX vs. QRSVX - Volatility Comparison

John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Small Cap Value Trust (JESVX) has a higher volatility of 5.27% compared to FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class (QRSVX) at 3.20%. This indicates that JESVX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRSVX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JESVXQRSVXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.27%

3.20%

+2.07%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.07%

10.57%

+3.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.91%

15.15%

+4.76%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.90%

17.45%

+3.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.31%

17.40%

+5.91%

JESVX vs. QRSVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JESVX has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than QRSVX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

JESVX vs. QRSVX - Dividend Comparison

JESVX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.41%, more than QRSVX's 3.55% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JESVX
John Hancock Variable Insurance Trust Small Cap Value Trust
9.41%11.72%6.53%9.41%21.62%1.33%12.54%7.49%16.31%0.76%
QRSVX
FPA Queens Road Small Cap Value Fund Investor Class
3.55%4.45%4.86%2.56%2.07%1.66%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JESVX and QRSVX have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JESVX has higher volatility (5.27%) compared to QRSVX (3.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JESVX dropped -46.09% vs QRSVX's -20.59%.

QRSVX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.96 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JESVX and QRSVX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer