JEPQ vs. PG
JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while PG (The Procter & Gamble Company) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, JEPQ returned 19.91%/yr vs 3.69%/yr for PG. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JEPQ vs. PG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly higher than PG's 5.93% return.
JEPQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 25.53%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
PG
- 1D
- 0.86%
- 1M
- 5.18%
- YTD
- 5.93%
- 6M
- 6.28%
- 1Y
- -5.68%
- 3Y*
- 3.69%
- 5Y*
- 4.73%
- 10Y*
- 8.96%
JEPQ vs. PG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.85% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 5.93% | -12.26% | 17.25% | -0.86% | -1.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPQ and PG is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.12 |
The correlation between JEPQ and PG shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPQ vs. PG — Risk / Return Rank
JEPQ
PG
JEPQ vs. PG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and The Procter & Gamble Company (PG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JEPQ | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +3.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.97 | +0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | -0.37 | +3.28 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.84 | -0.68 | +14.52 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JEPQ vs. PG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum PG drawdown of -54.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and PG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPQ | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -54.25% | +34.18% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -15.52% | +6.70% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -21.15% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.77% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -23.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -13.29% | +11.65% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -12.16% | +8.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 8.80% | -6.95% |
Volatility
JEPQ vs. PG - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 4.98%, while The Procter & Gamble Company (PG) has a volatility of 6.99%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPQ | PG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 6.99% | -2.01% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 15.01% | -4.79% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 18.78% | -6.17% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 17.82% | -1.09% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 19.05% | -2.32% |
Dividends
JEPQ vs. PG - Dividend Comparison
JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, more than PG's 2.85% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.22% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
PG The Procter & Gamble Company | 2.85% | 2.91% | 2.36% | 2.55% | 2.38% | 2.08% | 2.24% | 2.37% | 3.09% | 2.98% | 3.18% | 3.31% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPQ and PG have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
PG has higher volatility (6.99%) compared to JEPQ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs PG's -54.25%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEPQ and PG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer