JEPQ vs. MDLZ
JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while MDLZ (Mondelez International, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, JEPQ returned 19.91%/yr vs -1.98%/yr for MDLZ. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
JEPQ vs. MDLZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly lower than MDLZ's 18.03% return.
JEPQ
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- 0.68%
- YTD
- 7.85%
- 6M
- 8.80%
- 1Y
- 26.60%
- 3Y*
- 19.91%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MDLZ
- 1D
- -0.58%
- 1M
- 3.31%
- YTD
- 18.03%
- 6M
- 18.65%
- 1Y
- -2.75%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- 2.36%
- 10Y*
- 6.09%
JEPQ vs. MDLZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 7.85% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -11.16% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 18.03% | -7.03% | -15.30% | 11.17% | 4.91% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPQ and MDLZ is -0.07, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 4, 2022 | 0.15 |
The correlation between JEPQ and MDLZ shifts across timeframes, from -0.07 (1 year) to 0.15 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPQ vs. MDLZ — Risk / Return Rank
JEPQ
MDLZ
JEPQ vs. MDLZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JEPQ | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +2.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.82 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 0.98 | +0.42 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | -0.17 | +3.08 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 13.84 | -0.30 | +14.14 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JEPQ vs. MDLZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum MDLZ drawdown of -42.52%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and MDLZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPQ | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.07% | -42.52% | +22.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.82% | -25.93% | +17.11% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.07% | -29.00% | +8.93% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -29.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -29.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.64% | -12.59% | +10.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.41% | -11.03% | +7.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.85% | 14.70% | -12.85% |
Volatility
JEPQ vs. MDLZ - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 4.98%, while Mondelez International, Inc. (MDLZ) has a volatility of 5.46%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MDLZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPQ | MDLZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.98% | 5.46% | -0.48% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.22% | 16.28% | -6.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.61% | 22.26% | -9.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 19.52% | -2.79% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.73% | 21.03% | -4.30% |
Dividends
JEPQ vs. MDLZ - Dividend Comparison
JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, more than MDLZ's 3.13% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.22% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MDLZ Mondelez International, Inc. | 3.13% | 3.60% | 3.00% | 2.24% | 2.21% | 2.01% | 2.05% | 1.98% | 2.40% | 1.92% | 1.62% | 1.43% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPQ and MDLZ have a correlation of -0.07, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
MDLZ has higher volatility (5.46%) compared to JEPQ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs MDLZ's -42.52%.
JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEPQ and MDLZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer