JEPQ vs. BTCI

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) and BTCI (NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index, while BTCI is a Cryptocurrency fund actively managed by Neos. JEPQ is passively managed, while BTCI is actively managed. Over the past year, JEPQ returned 25.53% vs -35.48% for BTCI. At a 0.46 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEPQ charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for BTCI.

Performance

JEPQ vs. BTCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 7.85% return, which is significantly higher than BTCI's -24.54% return.

JEPQ

• 1D: 0.62%
• 1M: 0.88%
• YTD: 7.85%
• 6M: 8.80%
• 1Y: 25.53%
• 3Y*: 19.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BTCI

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -18.18%
• YTD: -24.54%
• 6M: -26.48%
• 1Y: -35.48%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPQ vs. BTCI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	7.85%	15.18%	5.38%
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	-24.54%	-1.09%	26.12%

Correlation

The correlation between JEPQ and BTCI is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.49
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2024	0.46

Return for Risk

JEPQ vs. BTCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPQ

JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 74
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 73
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 69
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 79
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 81

BTCI

BTCI Risk / Return Rank: 3
BTCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Omega Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3
BTCI Martin Ratio Rank: 3

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPQ vs. BTCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JEPQ	BTCI	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.03	-0.90	+2.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.69	-1.22	+3.92
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	0.86	+0.54
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.91	-0.75	+3.66
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.84	-1.36	+15.20

JEPQ vs. BTCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is higher than the BTCI Sharpe Ratio of -0.90. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPQ and BTCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JEPQ vs. BTCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum BTCI drawdown of -47.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and BTCI.

Drawdown Indicators

	JEPQ	BTCI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-20.07%	-47.16%	+27.09%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.82%	-47.16%	+38.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.07%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.64%	-44.20%	+42.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.41%	-15.65%	+12.24%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.85%	26.15%	-24.30%

Volatility

JEPQ vs. BTCI - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 4.98%, while NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF (BTCI) has a volatility of 11.27%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BTCI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JEPQ	BTCI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.98%	11.27%	-6.29%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.22%	31.13%	-20.91%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.61%	39.43%	-26.82%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.73%	40.27%	-23.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.73%	40.27%	-23.54%

JEPQ vs. BTCI - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BTCI's 0.99% expense ratio.

Dividends

JEPQ vs. BTCI - Dividend Comparison

JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.22%, less than BTCI's 44.19% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
BTCI NEOS Bitcoin High Income ETF	44.19%	36.46%	6.76%	0.00%	0.00%
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF	10.22%	10.53%	9.65%	10.03%	9.44%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JEPQ and BTCI in my portfolio?

JEPQ and BTCI have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JEPQ or BTCI?

BTCI has higher volatility (11.27%) compared to JEPQ (4.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs BTCI's -47.16%.

Which ETF is better, JEPQ or BTCI?

On 1-year performance, JEPQ leads with 25.53% vs -35.48% for BTCI. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 4.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JEPQ or BTCI?

Over the 1-year period, JEPQ has performed better with a 25.53% return vs -35.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JEPQ or BTCI?

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for BTCI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JEPQ or BTCI?

BTCI has the higher dividend yield at 44.19%, compared with 10.22% for JEPQ.

What is the main difference between JEPQ and BTCI?

JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BTCI is Cryptocurrency. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ and 0.99% for BTCI.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.90), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.