PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEPQ vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEPQ vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEPQ achieves a 9.54% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return.


JEPQ

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.31%
YTD
9.54%
6M
9.75%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
10Y*

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPQ vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
9.54%15.18%24.85%36.28%-12.89%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%-10.62%

Correlation

The correlation between JEPQ and BNO is -0.27, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022

0.01

The correlation between JEPQ and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.27 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEPQ vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPQ vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEPQBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.26

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.56

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

1.38

+0.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.31

5.17

-1.86

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

16.22

9.76

+6.46

JEPQ vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPQ Sharpe Ratio is 2.49, which is comparable to the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPQ and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEPQBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.49

2.23

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.69

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.00

0.14

+0.86

Drawdowns

JEPQ vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPQ drawdown since its inception was -20.07%, smaller than the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ and BNO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEPQBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.07%

-87.06%

+66.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.82%

-17.87%

+9.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.07%

-23.75%

+3.68%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.70%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.10%

-10.29%

+10.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.42%

-40.17%

+36.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.79%

9.45%

-7.66%

Volatility

JEPQ vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) is 1.26%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that JEPQ experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEPQBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

14.22%

-12.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.07%

36.10%

-27.03%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.73%

41.46%

-29.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.61%

35.38%

-18.77%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.61%

36.68%

-20.07%

JEPQ vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPQ has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEPQ vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

JEPQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.07%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.07%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEPQ and BNO have a correlation of -0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to JEPQ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEPQ dropped -20.07% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 3-year performance, BNO leads with 27.93% vs 20.92% for JEPQ. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, BNO has performed better with a 27.93% return vs 20.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.90% for BNO.

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

JEPQ is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while BNO is Oil & Gas. JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index, while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ and 0.90% for BNO.

JEPQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.49 vs 2.23), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEPQ and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer