PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) and Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JEPQ.L is traded in USD, while NASL.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the NASL.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEPQ.L achieves a 8.75% return, which is significantly lower than NASL.L's 19.63% return.


JEPQ.L

1D
-0.84%
1M
3.66%
YTD
8.75%
6M
10.24%
1Y
28.89%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

NASL.L

1D
-0.69%
1M
8.68%
YTD
19.63%
6M
19.32%
1Y
40.52%
3Y*
28.11%
5Y*
17.80%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JEPQ.L
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
8.75%14.77%2.89%
NASL.L
Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR
19.63%20.14%3.00%

Correlation

The correlation between JEPQ.L and NASL.L is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.73

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 7, 2024

0.80

The correlation between JEPQ.L and NASL.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.73 to 0.80 - a consistent structural relationship.

JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JEPQ.L
NASL.L

Technology

54.0%
53.7%

Communication Services

15.4%
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

12.7%
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

7.1%
7.7%

Healthcare

4.4%
4.2%

Industrials

3.1%
3.1%

Utilities

1.3%
1.4%

Basic Materials

1.0%
1.1%

Energy

0.4%
0.6%

Financial Services

0.4%
0.2%

Real Estate

0.2%
0.1%

Technology

JEPQ.L
54.0%
NASL.L
53.7%

Communication Services

JEPQ.L
15.4%
NASL.L
15.8%

Consumer Cyclical

JEPQ.L
12.7%
NASL.L
12.2%

Consumer Defensive

JEPQ.L
7.1%
NASL.L
7.7%

Healthcare

JEPQ.L
4.4%
NASL.L
4.2%

Industrials

JEPQ.L
3.1%
NASL.L
3.1%

Utilities

JEPQ.L
1.3%
NASL.L
1.4%

Basic Materials

JEPQ.L
1.0%
NASL.L
1.1%

Energy

JEPQ.L
0.4%
NASL.L
0.6%

Financial Services

JEPQ.L
0.4%
NASL.L
0.2%

Real Estate

JEPQ.L
0.2%
NASL.L
0.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEPQ.L
JEPQ.L Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
JEPQ.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ.L Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank

NASL.L
NASL.L Risk / Return Rank: 7878
Overall Rank
NASL.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8787
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NASL.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
NASL.L Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
NASL.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 7676
Calmar Ratio Rank
NASL.L Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) and Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JEPQ.LNASL.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.44

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.48

3.57

-0.09

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

15.39

13.27

+2.12

JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEPQ.L Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is comparable to the NASL.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.65. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEPQ.L and NASL.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JEPQ.LNASL.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

2.65

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.08

0.99

+0.09

Drawdowns

JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEPQ.L drawdown since its inception was -20.10%, smaller than the maximum NASL.L drawdown of -35.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ.L and NASL.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEPQ.LNASL.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-20.10%

-35.11%

+15.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.28%

-11.31%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-23.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-35.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.84%

-0.75%

-0.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.77%

-7.25%

+4.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.87%

3.04%

-1.17%

Volatility

JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) is 1.99%, while Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR (NASL.L) has a volatility of 4.35%. This indicates that JEPQ.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NASL.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEPQ.LNASL.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.99%

4.35%

-2.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.97%

11.14%

-2.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.95%

15.23%

-3.28%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.99%

20.36%

-4.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.99%

20.90%

-4.91%

JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEPQ.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than NASL.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEPQ.L vs. NASL.L - Dividend Comparison

JEPQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.20%, while NASL.L has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018
JEPQ.L
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)
10.20%10.06%0.74%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
NASL.L
Lyxor UCITS Nasdaq-100 D-EUR
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.69%0.68%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEPQ.L and NASL.L have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, NASL.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

NASL.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.L.

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Amundi. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ.L and 0.30% for NASL.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEPQ.L and NASL.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer