JEPQ.L vs. JUKE.L
JEPQ.L (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist)) and JUKE.L (JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist)) are both exchange-traded funds - JEPQ.L is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JUKE.L is a Europe Equities fund tracking the FTSE AllSh TR GBP. JEPQ.L is actively managed, while JUKE.L is passively managed. Over the past year, JEPQ.L returned 24.17% vs 18.58% for JUKE.L. At a 0.40 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEPQ.L charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for JUKE.L.
Performance
JEPQ.L vs. JUKE.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
JEPQ.L is traded in USD, while JUKE.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the JUKE.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEPQ.L achieves a 7.39% return, which is significantly higher than JUKE.L's 5.01% return.
JEPQ.L
- 1D
- -0.26%
- 1M
- 0.32%
- YTD
- 7.39%
- 6M
- 7.19%
- 1Y
- 24.17%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JUKE.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -1.93%
- YTD
- 5.01%
- 6M
- 5.22%
- 1Y
- 18.58%
- 3Y*
- 17.53%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JEPQ.L vs. JUKE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | |
|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 7.39% | 14.79% | 4.48% |
JUKE.L JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist) | 5.01% | 34.57% | -4.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEPQ.L and JUKE.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 29, 2024 | 0.40 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEPQ.L vs. JUKE.L — Risk / Return Rank
JEPQ.L
JUKE.L
JEPQ.L vs. JUKE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) and JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist) (JUKE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JEPQ.L | JUKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.89 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.24 | +0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.91 | 1.87 | +1.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 12.36 | 6.15 | +6.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JEPQ.L vs. JUKE.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEPQ.L drawdown since its inception was -20.08%, which is greater than JUKE.L's maximum drawdown of -18.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEPQ.L and JUKE.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEPQ.L | JUKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -20.08% | -18.62% | -1.46% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.31% | -9.93% | +1.62% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -12.74% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.83% | -4.87% | +2.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.71% | -2.93% | +0.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.96% | 3.02% | -1.06% |
Volatility
JEPQ.L vs. JUKE.L - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) (JEPQ.L) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist) (JUKE.L) at 3.45%. This indicates that JEPQ.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JUKE.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEPQ.L | JUKE.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.70% | 3.45% | +1.25% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.70% | 11.45% | -1.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.67% | 13.77% | -1.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 15.77% | +0.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.28% | 15.77% | +0.51% |
JEPQ.L vs. JUKE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEPQ.L has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than JUKE.L's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEPQ.L vs. JUKE.L - Dividend Comparison
JEPQ.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.00%, more than JUKE.L's 2.84% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ.L JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income Active UCITS ETF USD (Dist) | 10.00% | 10.06% | 0.74% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JUKE.L JPMorgan UK Equity Core UCITS ETF GBP (dist) | 2.84% | 2.79% | 3.11% | 2.94% | 1.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEPQ.L and JUKE.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JUKE.L is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JUKE.L is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for JEPQ.L.
JEPQ.L is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while JUKE.L is Europe Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for JEPQ.L and 0.25% for JUKE.L.
Find the right allocation for JEPQ.L and JUKE.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer