PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEMSX vs. COBYX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEMSX vs. COBYX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEMSX achieves a 20.99% return, which is significantly higher than COBYX's 11.82% return. Over the past 10 years, JEMSX has outperformed COBYX with an annualized return of 9.80%, while COBYX has yielded a comparatively lower 4.78% annualized return.


JEMSX

1D
4.24%
1M
-4.53%
6M
9.76%
YTD
20.99%
1Y
45.52%
3Y*
19.45%
5Y*
5.56%
10Y*
9.80%
ALL TIME*
5.92%

COBYX

1D
0.46%
1M
0.41%
6M
8.19%
YTD
11.82%
1Y
20.62%
3Y*
7.48%
5Y*
9.02%
10Y*
4.78%
ALL TIME*
4.78%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JEMSX vs. COBYX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
20.99%40.13%3.39%7.21%-25.77%-10.36%34.73%31.96%-16.02%42.49%
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
11.82%20.50%-10.32%16.73%9.28%9.05%-10.97%9.40%-13.40%15.12%

Correlation

The correlation between JEMSX and COBYX is 0.24, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.24

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013

0.51

Over the past year, the correlation between JEMSX and COBYX has dropped to 0.24 - well below their long-term average of 0.51, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEMSX vs. COBYX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JEMSX
JEMSX Risk / Return Rank: 7676
Overall Rank
JEMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
JEMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

COBYX
COBYX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
COBYX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
COBYX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
COBYX Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
COBYX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
COBYX Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JEMSX vs. COBYX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) and The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JEMSXCOBYXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.10

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.16

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.30

+0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

2.17

+0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.28

7.33

+2.96

JEMSX vs. COBYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEMSX Sharpe Ratio is 1.74, which is comparable to the COBYX Sharpe Ratio of 1.64. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEMSX and COBYX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JEMSX vs. COBYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEMSX drawdown since its inception was -62.07%, which is greater than COBYX's maximum drawdown of -34.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMSX and COBYX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEMSXCOBYXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.07%

-34.18%

-27.89%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.85%

-8.95%

-5.90%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.10%

-16.29%

+1.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-43.40%

-17.10%

-26.30%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-49.59%

-34.18%

-15.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.24%

-0.15%

-11.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.61%

-6.74%

-14.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.18%

2.68%

+1.50%

Volatility

JEMSX vs. COBYX - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I (JEMSX) has a higher volatility of 10.61% compared to The Cook & Bynum Fund (COBYX) at 3.16%. This indicates that JEMSX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than COBYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEMSXCOBYXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.61%

3.16%

+7.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

22.38%

9.77%

+12.61%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.77%

11.82%

+12.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.23%

13.96%

+6.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.91%

13.67%

+6.24%

JEMSX vs. COBYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEMSX has a 0.99% expense ratio, which is lower than COBYX's 1.49% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEMSX vs. COBYX - Dividend Comparison

JEMSX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%, which matches COBYX's 1.05% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
COBYX
The Cook & Bynum Fund
1.05%1.18%0.00%1.01%1.16%2.18%0.32%0.69%12.60%1.88%5.09%0.00%
JEMSX
JPMorgan Emerging Markets Equity Fund Class I
1.04%1.26%1.41%1.45%0.37%3.80%0.09%0.76%0.87%0.39%0.66%0.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


JEMSX and COBYX have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JEMSX has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to COBYX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMSX dropped -62.07% vs COBYX's -34.18%.

JEMSX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs 1.64), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEMSX and COBYX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer