JEMDX vs. EDD
JEMDX (JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund) and EDD (Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund) are both Emerging Markets Bonds funds. Over the past 10 years, JEMDX returned 3.30%/yr vs 5.76%/yr for EDD. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JEMDX charges 0.83%/yr vs 2.20%/yr for EDD.
Performance
JEMDX vs. EDD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JEMDX achieves a 3.22% return, which is significantly lower than EDD's 8.33% return. Over the past 10 years, JEMDX has underperformed EDD with an annualized return of 3.30%, while EDD has yielded a comparatively higher 5.76% annualized return.
JEMDX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 2.32%
- YTD
- 3.22%
- 6M
- 3.54%
- 1Y
- 14.49%
- 3Y*
- 10.61%
- 5Y*
- 1.97%
- 10Y*
- 3.30%
EDD
- 1D
- 0.88%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- YTD
- 8.33%
- 6M
- 6.75%
- 1Y
- 23.75%
- 3Y*
- 16.68%
- 5Y*
- 7.47%
- 10Y*
- 5.76%
JEMDX vs. EDD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEMDX JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund | 3.22% | 13.87% | 7.37% | 10.17% | -18.60% | -3.22% | 5.37% | 13.86% | -5.82% | 10.25% |
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 8.33% | 32.46% | 8.64% | 14.09% | -14.15% | -7.03% | -2.84% | 25.45% | -14.09% | 16.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between JEMDX and EDD is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.43 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 24, 2007 | 0.44 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JEMDX vs. EDD — Risk / Return Rank
JEMDX
EDD
JEMDX vs. EDD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX) and Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JEMDX | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.55 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.65 | 1.26 | +0.38 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.79 | 1.35 | +1.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.73 | 4.33 | +7.39 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JEMDX vs. EDD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JEMDX drawdown since its inception was -38.84%, smaller than the maximum EDD drawdown of -59.38%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEMDX and EDD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JEMDX | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -38.84% | -59.38% | +20.54% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -5.14% | -17.67% | +12.53% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -7.10% | -17.67% | +10.57% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.83% | -32.04% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.83% | -42.70% | +11.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -4.67% | +4.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -6.08% | -24.19% | +18.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.22% | 5.50% | -4.28% |
Volatility
JEMDX vs. EDD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund (JEMDX) is 1.28%, while Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund (EDD) has a volatility of 4.25%. This indicates that JEMDX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EDD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JEMDX | EDD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.28% | 4.25% | -2.97% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.05% | 13.18% | -9.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.78% | 16.39% | -11.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 6.92% | 15.41% | -8.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 7.14% | 17.72% | -10.58% |
JEMDX vs. EDD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JEMDX has a 0.83% expense ratio, which is lower than EDD's 2.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
JEMDX vs. EDD - Dividend Comparison
JEMDX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.83%, less than EDD's 8.92% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EDD Morgan Stanley Emerging Markets Domestic Fund | 8.92% | 9.76% | 11.45% | 7.30% | 6.82% | 6.93% | 6.92% | 8.15% | 9.90% | 8.18% | 10.32% | 12.65% |
JEMDX JPMorgan Emerging Markets Debt Fund | 5.83% | 5.61% | 6.13% | 5.47% | 6.15% | 4.38% | 3.71% | 4.52% | 4.64% | 4.43% | 5.06% | 4.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JEMDX and EDD have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
EDD has higher volatility (4.25%) compared to JEMDX (1.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JEMDX dropped -38.84% vs EDD's -59.38%.
JEMDX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.01 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JEMDX and EDD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer