PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JEDI.DE vs. XRSG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JEDI.DE vs. XRSG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE) and Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

JEDI.DE is traded in EUR, while XRSG.L is traded in GBp. To make them comparable, the XRSG.L values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JEDI.DE achieves a 21.25% return, which is significantly lower than XRSG.L's 22.39% return.


JEDI.DE

1D
0.00%
1M
-18.08%
6M
-4.21%
YTD
21.25%
1Y
56.02%
3Y*
45.33%
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
35.42%

XRSG.L

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.09%
6M
14.75%
YTD
22.39%
1Y
35.57%
3Y*
14.59%
5Y*
7.54%
10Y*
9.84%
ALL TIME*
4.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JEDI.DE vs. XRSG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
JEDI.DE
VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF
21.25%72.15%52.14%8.55%-0.32%
XRSG.L
Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C
22.39%-0.81%17.19%14.54%2.35%

Correlation

The correlation between JEDI.DE and XRSG.L is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 24, 2022

0.61

The correlation between JEDI.DE and XRSG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.61 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JEDI.DE vs. XRSG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JEDI.DE
JEDI.DE Risk / Return Rank: 4141
Overall Rank
JEDI.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 4141
Omega Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEDI.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank

XRSG.L
XRSG.L Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
XRSG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XRSG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
XRSG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XRSG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
XRSG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 7979
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JEDI.DE vs. XRSG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE) and Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JEDI.DEXRSG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.85

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.03

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.34

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.37

4.19

-2.81

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.33

12.10

-7.77

JEDI.DE vs. XRSG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JEDI.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.19, which is lower than the XRSG.L Sharpe Ratio of 2.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JEDI.DE and XRSG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JEDI.DE vs. XRSG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JEDI.DE drawdown since its inception was -40.95%, smaller than the maximum XRSG.L drawdown of -51.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JEDI.DE and XRSG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JEDI.DEXRSG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-40.95%

-51.98%

+11.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-40.95%

-8.45%

-32.50%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-40.95%

-31.91%

-9.04%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-40.64%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-40.95%

-2.95%

-38.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.86%

-18.89%

+11.03%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.98%

2.93%

+10.05%

Volatility

JEDI.DE vs. XRSG.L - Volatility Comparison

VanEck Space Innovators UCITS ETF (JEDI.DE) has a higher volatility of 15.14% compared to Xtrackers Russell 2000 UCITS ETF 1C (XRSG.L) at 4.53%. This indicates that JEDI.DE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XRSG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JEDI.DEXRSG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.14%

4.53%

+10.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.94%

12.30%

+24.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

47.21%

17.38%

+29.83%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.46%

24.32%

+9.14%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.46%

23.33%

+10.13%

JEDI.DE vs. XRSG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

JEDI.DE has a 0.55% expense ratio, which is higher than XRSG.L's 0.30% expense ratio.


Dividends

JEDI.DE vs. XRSG.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JEDI.DE nor XRSG.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JEDI.DE and XRSG.L have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XRSG.L is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XRSG.L is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.55% for JEDI.DE.

JEDI.DE is categorized as Industrials Equities, while XRSG.L is Small Cap Blend Equities. JEDI.DE tracks MarketVector Global Space Industry Screened Index, while XRSG.L tracks Russell 2000 TR USD. They also come from different issuers: VanEck and Xtrackers. Their fees differ too: 0.55% for JEDI.DE and 0.30% for XRSG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JEDI.DE and XRSG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer