JDVL vs. SDOG
JDVL (John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF) and SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. JDVL is actively managed, while SDOG is passively managed. Over the past year, JDVL returned 31.33% vs 30.19% for SDOG. Their 0.50 correlation means they have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently. JDVL charges 0.56%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SDOG.
Performance
JDVL vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDVL achieves a 19.35% return, which is significantly lower than SDOG's 21.12% return.
JDVL
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 1.50%
- 6M
- 12.32%
- YTD
- 19.35%
- 1Y
- 31.33%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
SDOG
- 1D
- -0.94%
- 1M
- 3.78%
- 6M
- 10.94%
- YTD
- 21.12%
- 1Y
- 30.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.93%
- 5Y*
- 10.90%
- 10Y*
- 9.72%
- ALL TIME*
- 11.79%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $2.18M | $3.04M | $2.37M | |
| $3.61M | $3.57M | $3.76M |
JDVL vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JDVL John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF | 19.35% | 10.04% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 21.12% | 7.49% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDVL and SDOG is 0.50, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025 | 0.50 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDVL vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank
JDVL
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
SDOG
JDVL vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF (JDVL) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JDVL | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.46 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 4.86 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 16.67 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JDVL vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDVL drawdown since its inception was -9.17%, smaller than the maximum SDOG drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDVL and SDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDVL | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -9.17% | -43.56% | +34.39% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.17% | -6.24% | -2.93% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -16.00% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.84% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -43.56% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -1.85% | +1.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.23% | -4.87% | +3.64% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.82% | — |
Volatility
JDVL vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDVL | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 8.45% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.11% | 11.59% | +2.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 15.33% | -1.22% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.11% | 18.98% | -4.87% |
JDVL vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDVL has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
JDVL vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison
JDVL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%, less than SDOG's 3.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDVL John Hancock Disciplined Value Select ETF | 1.43% | 1.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.31% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JDVL and SDOG have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On 1-year performance, JDVL leads with 31.33% vs 30.19% for SDOG. On fees, SDOG is cheaper at 0.36% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, JDVL has performed better with a 31.33% return vs 30.19%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SDOG is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.56% for JDVL.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.31%, compared with 1.43% for JDVL.
They also come from different issuers: John Hancock and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.56% for JDVL and 0.36% for SDOG.
Find the right allocation for JDVL and SDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer