JDVI vs. JHLN

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

JDVI (John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF) and JHLN (John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JDVI is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by John Hancock, while JHLN is a Bank Loan fund actively managed by John Hancock. Both are actively managed. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JDVI charges 0.69%/yr vs 0.59%/yr for JHLN.

Performance

JDVI vs. JHLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) and John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDVI achieves a 10.84% return, which is significantly higher than JHLN's 0.81% return.

JDVI

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: 0.29%
• YTD: 10.84%
• 6M: 11.64%
• 1Y: 29.26%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JHLN

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.32%
• YTD: 0.81%
• 6M: 1.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JDVI vs. JHLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
JDVI John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF	10.84%	11.29%
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF	0.81%	1.55%

Correlation

The correlation between JDVI and JHLN is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 20, 2025	0.11

Return for Risk

JDVI vs. JHLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JDVI

JDVI Risk / Return Rank: 51
JDVI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
JDVI Sortino Ratio Rank: 50
JDVI Omega Ratio Rank: 51
JDVI Calmar Ratio Rank: 49
JDVI Martin Ratio Rank: 52

JHLN

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JDVI vs. JHLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF (JDVI) and John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF (JHLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JDVI	JHLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.73	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.37	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.31	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.35	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.77	—	—

Drawdowns

JDVI vs. JHLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDVI drawdown since its inception was -14.97%, which is greater than JHLN's maximum drawdown of -1.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDVI and JHLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	JDVI	JHLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-14.97%	-1.46%	-13.51%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.50%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.06%	0.00%	-2.06%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.78%	-0.31%	-2.47%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.35%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JDVI	JHLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.69%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.66%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	16.99%	2.62%	+14.37%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.58%	2.62%	+13.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	16.58%	2.62%	+13.96%

JDVI vs. JHLN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDVI has a 0.69% expense ratio, which is higher than JHLN's 0.59% expense ratio.

Dividends

JDVI vs. JHLN - Dividend Comparison

JDVI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.19%, less than JHLN's 3.85% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
JDVI John Hancock Disciplined Value International Select ETF	2.19%	2.43%	1.87%
JHLN John Hancock Global Senior Loan ETF	3.85%	1.88%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JDVI and JHLN in my portfolio?

JDVI and JHLN have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JDVI or JHLN?

On fees, JHLN is cheaper at 0.59% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JDVI or JHLN?

JHLN is cheaper with a 0.59% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for JDVI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JDVI or JHLN?

JHLN has the higher dividend yield at 3.85%, compared with 2.19% for JDVI.

What is the main difference between JDVI and JHLN?

JDVI is categorized as Foreign Large Cap Equities, while JHLN is Bank Loan. Their fees differ too: 0.69% for JDVI and 0.59% for JHLN.