JDST vs. SOXS
JDST (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares) and SOXS (Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion - JDST tracks the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (-300%) while SOXS tracks the PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, JDST returned -64.82%/yr vs -78.81%/yr for SOXS. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JDST charges 1.10%/yr vs 1.08%/yr for SOXS.
Performance
JDST vs. SOXS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDST achieves a -35.89% return, which is significantly higher than SOXS's -91.68% return. Over the past 10 years, JDST has outperformed SOXS with an annualized return of -64.82%, while SOXS has yielded a comparatively lower -78.81% annualized return.
JDST
- 1D
- -1.51%
- 1M
- -7.51%
- YTD
- -35.89%
- 6M
- -46.82%
- 1Y
- -81.68%
- 3Y*
- -69.10%
- 5Y*
- -52.94%
- 10Y*
- -64.82%
SOXS
- 1D
- -17.41%
- 1M
- -60.17%
- YTD
- -91.68%
- 6M
- -91.80%
- 1Y
- -97.83%
- 3Y*
- -86.41%
- 5Y*
- -79.75%
- 10Y*
- -78.81%
JDST vs. SOXS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDST Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares | -35.89% | -91.10% | -40.98% | -28.29% | -26.25% | 10.97% | -95.97% | -80.30% | -1.60% | -63.44% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | -91.68% | -85.53% | -59.55% | -84.56% | 15.76% | -80.94% | -92.90% | -83.81% | -19.39% | -69.39% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDST and SOXS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 4, 2013 | 0.14 |
The correlation between JDST and SOXS shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (all time) to 0.30 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDST vs. SOXS — Risk / Return Rank
JDST
SOXS
JDST vs. SOXS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) and Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JDST | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.83 | -0.96 | +0.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.79 | -3.97 | +2.18 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 0.58 | +0.23 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.94 | -1.00 | +0.06 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.29 | -1.39 | +0.10 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JDST | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.83 | -0.96 | +0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 | -0.74 | +0.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.62 | -0.79 | +0.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.59 | -0.79 | +0.19 |
Drawdowns
JDST vs. SOXS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, roughly equal to the maximum SOXS drawdown of -100.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDST and SOXS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDST | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.98% | -97.64% | +8.66% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.58% | -99.79% | +1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.28% | -99.97% | +0.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -100.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.32% | -92.60% | -2.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 65.20% | 70.48% | -5.28% |
Volatility
JDST vs. SOXS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) is 32.18%, while Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares (SOXS) has a volatility of 44.74%. This indicates that JDST experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SOXS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDST | SOXS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 32.18% | 44.74% | -12.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 79.24% | 83.91% | -4.67% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.90% | 102.16% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 80.87% | 108.22% | -27.35% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.74% | 100.49% | +4.25% |
JDST vs. SOXS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDST has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than SOXS's 1.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
JDST vs. SOXS - Dividend Comparison
JDST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.55%, less than SOXS's 64.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDST Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares | 12.55% | 15.08% | 6.50% | 4.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 3.16% | 0.57% |
SOXS Direxion Daily Semiconductor Bear 3x Shares | 64.90% | 10.79% | 5.45% | 9.22% | 0.19% | 0.00% | 3.58% | 2.30% | 0.76% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JDST and SOXS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SOXS has higher volatility (44.74%) compared to JDST (32.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDST dropped -100.00% vs SOXS's -100.00%.
On 10-year performance, JDST leads with -64.82% vs -78.81% for SOXS. On fees, SOXS is cheaper at 1.08% per year. On volatility, JDST has been the lower-risk option at 32.18%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, JDST has performed better with a -64.82% return vs -78.81%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SOXS is cheaper with a 1.08% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for JDST.
SOXS has the higher dividend yield at 64.90%, compared with 12.55% for JDST.
JDST tracks MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (-300%), while SOXS tracks PHLX Semiconductor Index (-300%). Their fees differ too: 1.10% for JDST and 1.08% for SOXS.
JDST currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.83 vs -0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JDST and SOXS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer