JDST vs. MOOD
JDST (Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares) and MOOD (Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JDST is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the MVIS Global Junior Gold Miners Index (-300%), while MOOD is a Tactical Allocation fund actively managed by Relative Sentiment. JDST is passively managed, while MOOD is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JDST returned -65.43%/yr vs 19.36%/yr for MOOD. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. JDST charges 1.10%/yr vs 0.73%/yr for MOOD.
Performance
JDST vs. MOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JDST achieves a -15.75% return, which is significantly lower than MOOD's 13.29% return.
JDST
- 1D
- 7.16%
- 1M
- 12.73%
- 6M
- 5.01%
- YTD
- -15.75%
- 1Y
- -75.99%
- 3Y*
- -65.43%
- 5Y*
- -52.35%
- 10Y*
- -60.31%
MOOD
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -0.72%
- 6M
- 7.35%
- YTD
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 30.71%
- 3Y*
- 19.36%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JDST vs. MOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDST Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares | -15.75% | -91.10% | -40.98% | -28.29% | -30.18% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 13.29% | 30.39% | 12.53% | 12.56% | -3.31% |
Correlation
The correlation between JDST and MOOD is -0.74, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.74 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.62 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 19, 2022 | -0.60 |
The correlation between JDST and MOOD shifts across timeframes, from -0.74 (1 year) to -0.60 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JDST vs. MOOD — Risk / Return Rank
JDST
MOOD
JDST vs. MOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) and Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| JDST | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.82 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.76 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.41 | -0.54 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.86 | 3.18 | -4.03 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.08 | 9.68 | -10.76 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
JDST vs. MOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JDST drawdown since its inception was -100.00%, which is greater than MOOD's maximum drawdown of -14.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDST and MOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JDST | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -100.00% | -14.34% | -85.66% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -88.98% | -9.71% | -79.27% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.58% | -9.71% | -88.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.28% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -100.00% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -100.00% | -2.06% | -97.94% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -95.33% | -2.31% | -93.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 70.33% | 3.18% | +67.15% |
Volatility
JDST vs. MOOD - Volatility Comparison
Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares (JDST) has a higher volatility of 34.78% compared to Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF (MOOD) at 4.02%. This indicates that JDST's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MOOD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JDST | MOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 34.78% | 4.02% | +30.76% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 86.06% | 12.60% | +73.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 105.38% | 14.71% | +90.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 82.47% | 12.13% | +70.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 104.51% | 12.13% | +92.38% |
JDST vs. MOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
JDST has a 1.10% expense ratio, which is higher than MOOD's 0.73% expense ratio.
Dividends
JDST vs. MOOD - Dividend Comparison
JDST's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.76%, more than MOOD's 0.36% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JDST Direxion Daily Junior Gold Miners Index Bear 2X Shares | 5.76% | 15.08% | 6.50% | 4.81% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 3.16% | 0.57% |
MOOD Relative Sentiment Tactical Allocation ETF | 0.36% | 0.40% | 1.33% | 1.34% | 1.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JDST and MOOD have a correlation of -0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JDST has higher volatility (34.78%) compared to MOOD (4.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDST dropped -100.00% vs MOOD's -14.34%.
On 3-year performance, MOOD leads with 19.36% vs -65.43% for JDST. On fees, MOOD is cheaper at 0.73% per year. On volatility, MOOD has been the lower-risk option at 4.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, MOOD has performed better with a 19.36% return vs -65.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
MOOD is cheaper with a 0.73% expense ratio, compared with 1.10% for JDST.
JDST has the higher dividend yield at 5.76%, compared with 0.36% for MOOD.
JDST is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while MOOD is Tactical Allocation. They also come from different issuers: Direxion and Relative Sentiment. Their fees differ too: 1.10% for JDST and 0.73% for MOOD.
MOOD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs -0.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JDST and MOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer