PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JDJIX vs. RMDFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JDJIX vs. RMDFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JHancock Diversified Macro Fund (JDJIX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JDJIX achieves a 10.22% return, which is significantly higher than RMDFX's 7.66% return.


JDJIX

1D
-0.33%
1M
0.33%
6M
6.26%
YTD
10.22%
1Y
8.73%
3Y*
0.75%
5Y*
3.07%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
2.27%

RMDFX

1D
0.55%
1M
1.67%
6M
3.81%
YTD
7.66%
1Y
18.23%
3Y*
10.21%
5Y*
5.69%
10Y*
5.26%
ALL TIME*
5.12%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

JDJIX vs. RMDFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JDJIX
JHancock Diversified Macro Fund
10.22%-7.68%2.59%2.77%12.26%-2.19%-2.24%1.59%
RMDFX
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund
7.66%18.85%1.45%8.01%-6.84%4.20%5.10%3.39%

Correlation

The correlation between JDJIX and RMDFX is 0.35, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.35

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.26

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.14

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2019

0.25

The correlation between JDJIX and RMDFX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (5 years) to 0.35 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JDJIX vs. RMDFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JDJIX
JDJIX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
JDJIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JDJIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
JDJIX Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
JDJIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JDJIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2323
Martin Ratio Rank

RMDFX
RMDFX Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
RMDFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9999
Sharpe Ratio Rank
RMDFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
RMDFX Omega Ratio Rank: 9898
Omega Ratio Rank
RMDFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
RMDFX Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JDJIX vs. RMDFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JHancock Diversified Macro Fund (JDJIX) and Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JDJIXRMDFXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.95

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-4.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.15

1.80

-0.64

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.18

4.40

-3.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.29

16.24

-12.96

JDJIX vs. RMDFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JDJIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the RMDFX Sharpe Ratio of 3.80. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JDJIX and RMDFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JDJIX vs. RMDFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JDJIX drawdown since its inception was -19.58%, which is greater than RMDFX's maximum drawdown of -15.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JDJIX and RMDFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JDJIXRMDFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-19.58%

-15.96%

-3.62%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-5.07%

-4.19%

-0.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.58%

-5.79%

-13.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.58%

-14.63%

-4.95%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-15.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.22%

0.00%

-10.22%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.45%

-3.30%

-4.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.90%

1.13%

+0.77%

Volatility

JDJIX vs. RMDFX - Volatility Comparison

JHancock Diversified Macro Fund (JDJIX) has a higher volatility of 1.77% compared to Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund (RMDFX) at 1.18%. This indicates that JDJIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than RMDFX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JDJIXRMDFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.77%

1.18%

+0.59%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.15%

4.10%

+1.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.09%

4.86%

+2.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

8.83%

6.34%

+2.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.12%

6.22%

+2.90%

JDJIX vs. RMDFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JDJIX has a 1.39% expense ratio, which is higher than RMDFX's 0.18% expense ratio.


Dividends

JDJIX vs. RMDFX - Dividend Comparison

JDJIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.28%, less than RMDFX's 4.30% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
JDJIX
JHancock Diversified Macro Fund
0.28%0.31%0.43%3.99%11.26%3.46%2.11%3.79%0.00%0.00%0.00%
RMDFX
Aspiriant Defensive Allocation Fund
4.30%4.63%0.00%3.69%0.78%5.37%2.28%3.78%4.11%2.16%1.16%

Frequently Asked Questions


JDJIX and RMDFX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JDJIX has higher volatility (1.77%) compared to RMDFX (1.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JDJIX dropped -19.58% vs RMDFX's -15.96%.

RMDFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.80 vs 0.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JDJIX and RMDFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer