PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Leverage Shares 3x JD.Com ETP Securities (JD3.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JD3.L achieves a -3.88% return, which is significantly higher than 3NIE.L's -29.41% return.


JD3.L

1D
-1.16%
1M
-10.54%
YTD
-3.88%
6M
-16.34%
1Y
-53.45%
3Y*
-57.63%
5Y*
10Y*

3NIE.L

1D
-2.04%
1M
-22.58%
YTD
-29.41%
6M
-14.29%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between JD3.L and 3NIE.L is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 26, 2025

0.39

JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JD3.L
3NIE.L

Consumer Cyclical

100.0%
100.0%

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

JD3.L
100.0%
3NIE.L
100.0%

Basic Materials

JD3.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Communication Services

JD3.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Consumer Defensive

JD3.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Energy

JD3.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Financial Services

JD3.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Healthcare

JD3.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Industrials

JD3.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Real Estate

JD3.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Technology

JD3.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Utilities

JD3.L

-

3NIE.L

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JD3.L
JD3.L Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
JD3.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JD3.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
JD3.L Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
JD3.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
JD3.L Martin Ratio Rank: 33
Martin Ratio Rank

3NIE.L
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Leverage Shares 3x JD.Com ETP Securities (JD3.L) and Leverage Shares 3x Long NIO ETP Securities (3NIE.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JD3.L3NIE.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.95

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.74

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.25

JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JD3.L3NIE.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.54

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.47

-0.39

-0.08

Drawdowns

JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JD3.L drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than 3NIE.L's maximum drawdown of -60.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JD3.L and 3NIE.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JD3.L3NIE.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.97%

-60.65%

-39.32%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-72.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-96.55%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.95%

-49.83%

-50.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-88.83%

-36.22%

-52.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

42.90%

Volatility

JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JD3.L3NIE.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

71.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

99.26%

175.21%

-75.95%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

162.88%

175.21%

-12.33%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

162.88%

175.21%

-12.33%

JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JD3.L and 3NIE.L have an expense ratio of 0.75%.


Dividends

JD3.L vs. 3NIE.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither JD3.L nor 3NIE.L has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


JD3.L and 3NIE.L have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Both ETFs have the same 0.75% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JD3.L and 3NIE.L have the same expense ratio: 0.75% per year.

JD3.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x JD Index, while 3NIE.L tracks iSTOXX Leveraged 3x NIO Index.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JD3.L and 3NIE.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer