JCTR vs. SAMT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JCTR (JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF) and SAMT (Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF) are both Large Cap Blend Equities funds. JCTR is passively managed, while SAMT is actively managed. A 0.72 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. JCTR charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for SAMT.

Performance

JCTR vs. SAMT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF (JCTR) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

JCTR

• 1D: —
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SAMT

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 6.66%
• YTD: 20.25%
• 6M: 23.92%
• 1Y: 42.07%
• 3Y*: 28.84%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCTR vs. SAMT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JCTR JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF	0.00%	13.55%	24.74%	27.51%	-11.23%
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	20.25%	33.10%	28.15%	1.27%	-6.59%

Correlation

The correlation between JCTR and SAMT is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.29
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.64
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2022	0.72

Over the past year, the correlation between JCTR and SAMT has dropped to 0.29 - well below their long-term average of 0.72, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JCTR vs. SAMT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JCTR	SAMT
Technology	37.2%	27.8%
Financial Services	14.7%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	10.9%	5.6%
Healthcare	9.5%	4.3%
Communication Services	9.5%	7.8%
Industrials	6.3%	22.0%
Energy	2.9%	2.9%
Consumer Defensive	2.9%	12.0%
Real Estate	2.3%	2.9%
Utilities	2.0%	6.6%
Basic Materials	1.7%	2.7%

Return for Risk

JCTR vs. SAMT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SAMT

SAMT Risk / Return Rank: 77
SAMT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
SAMT Sortino Ratio Rank: 74
SAMT Omega Ratio Rank: 70
SAMT Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
SAMT Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCTR vs. SAMT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF (JCTR) and Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF (SAMT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JCTR	SAMT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.53	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	—	0.98	—

Drawdowns

Drawdown Indicators

	JCTR	SAMT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	—	-20.57%	—
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.15%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.27%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	—	-0.66%	—
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	—	-7.72%	—
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	2.95%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	JCTR	SAMT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	6.82%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.56%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	16.68%	—
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	—	16.94%	—
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	—	16.94%	—

JCTR vs. SAMT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCTR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than SAMT's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCTR vs. SAMT - Dividend Comparison

JCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than SAMT's 0.58% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
JCTR JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF	0.43%	0.61%	1.04%	1.88%	1.53%	1.13%	0.13%
SAMT Strategas Macro Thematic Opportunities ETF	0.58%	0.70%	1.40%	1.49%	0.73%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCTR and SAMT in my portfolio?

JCTR and SAMT have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, JCTR or SAMT?

On fees, JCTR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, JCTR or SAMT?

JCTR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.66% for SAMT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JCTR or SAMT?

SAMT has the higher dividend yield at 0.58%, compared with 0.43% for JCTR.

What is the main difference between JCTR and SAMT?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Strategas. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for JCTR and 0.66% for SAMT.