PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCTR vs. CRBN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCTR vs. CRBN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF (JCTR) and iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


JCTR

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CRBN

1D
0.54%
1M
5.38%
YTD
11.84%
6M
13.43%
1Y
29.02%
3Y*
21.52%
5Y*
11.46%
10Y*
12.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCTR vs. CRBN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
JCTR
JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF
0.00%13.55%24.74%27.51%-18.76%29.86%2.11%
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
11.84%21.85%19.29%22.31%-19.12%18.82%2.08%

Correlation

The correlation between JCTR and CRBN is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.80

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.89

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 11, 2020

0.89

Over the past year, the correlation between JCTR and CRBN has dropped to 0.42 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

JCTR vs. CRBN - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JCTR
CRBN

Technology

37.2%
32.3%

Financial Services

14.7%
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.9%
7.7%

Healthcare

9.5%
8.1%

Communication Services

9.5%
9.6%

Industrials

6.3%
9.4%

Energy

2.9%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

2.9%
4.4%

Real Estate

2.3%
2.9%

Utilities

2.0%
2.2%

Basic Materials

1.7%
2.5%

Technology

JCTR
37.2%
CRBN
32.3%

Financial Services

JCTR
14.7%
CRBN
18.3%

Consumer Cyclical

JCTR
10.9%
CRBN
7.7%

Healthcare

JCTR
9.5%
CRBN
8.1%

Communication Services

JCTR
9.5%
CRBN
9.6%

Industrials

JCTR
6.3%
CRBN
9.4%

Energy

JCTR
2.9%
CRBN
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

JCTR
2.9%
CRBN
4.4%

Real Estate

JCTR
2.3%
CRBN
2.9%

Utilities

JCTR
2.0%
CRBN
2.2%

Basic Materials

JCTR
1.7%
CRBN
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCTR vs. CRBN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCTR

CRBN
CRBN Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
CRBN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRBN Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRBN Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
CRBN Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRBN Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCTR vs. CRBN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF (JCTR) and iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

JCTR vs. CRBN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCTRCRBNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.72

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.70

Drawdowns

JCTR vs. CRBN - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCTRCRBNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.08%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-16.60%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.04%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.28%

Volatility

JCTR vs. CRBN - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCTRCRBNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.61%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.50%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.90%

JCTR vs. CRBN - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCTR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CRBN's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

JCTR vs. CRBN - Dividend Comparison

JCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.43%, less than CRBN's 1.97% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CRBN
iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF
1.97%2.21%1.94%2.01%1.95%1.57%1.41%2.27%2.51%2.05%2.27%2.01%
JCTR
JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF
0.43%0.61%1.04%1.88%1.53%1.13%0.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCTR and CRBN have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, JCTR is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

JCTR is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for CRBN.

CRBN has the higher dividend yield at 1.97%, compared with 0.43% for JCTR.

JCTR is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while CRBN is Large Cap Growth Equities. JCTR tracks JPMorgan Asset Management Carbon Transition U.S. Equity Index, while CRBN tracks MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for JCTR and 0.20% for CRBN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCTR and CRBN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer