JCTR vs. CRBN
Compare and contrast key facts about JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF (JCTR) and iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN).
JCTR and CRBN are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. JCTR is a passively managed fund by JPMorgan Chase that tracks the performance of the JPMorgan Asset Management Carbon Transition U.S. Equity Index. It was launched on Dec 9, 2020. CRBN is a passively managed fund by iShares that tracks the performance of the MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target Index. It was launched on Dec 8, 2014. Both JCTR and CRBN are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: JCTR or CRBN.
Correlation
The correlation between JCTR and CRBN is 0.96, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
JCTR vs. CRBN - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
JCTR:
0.54
CRBN:
0.69
JCTR:
0.89
CRBN:
1.10
JCTR:
1.13
CRBN:
1.16
JCTR:
0.56
CRBN:
0.74
JCTR:
2.13
CRBN:
3.26
JCTR:
5.12%
CRBN:
3.79%
JCTR:
20.03%
CRBN:
17.72%
JCTR:
-24.76%
CRBN:
-33.13%
JCTR:
-7.98%
CRBN:
-4.09%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JCTR achieves a -3.54% return, which is significantly lower than CRBN's 1.11% return.
JCTR
-3.54%
14.43%
-4.54%
10.81%
N/A
N/A
CRBN
1.11%
15.01%
-1.14%
12.14%
13.52%
9.08%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
JCTR vs. CRBN - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCTR has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CRBN's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
JCTR vs. CRBN — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
JCTR
CRBN
JCTR vs. CRBN - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF (JCTR) and iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
JCTR vs. CRBN - Dividend Comparison
JCTR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.10%, less than CRBN's 1.92% yield.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCTR JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF | 1.10% | 1.04% | 1.88% | 1.53% | 1.13% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CRBN iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF | 1.92% | 1.94% | 2.01% | 1.95% | 1.57% | 1.41% | 2.26% | 2.51% | 2.05% | 2.27% | 2.01% |
Drawdowns
JCTR vs. CRBN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCTR drawdown since its inception was -24.76%, smaller than the maximum CRBN drawdown of -33.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCTR and CRBN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
JCTR vs. CRBN - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Carbon Transition U.S. Equity ETF (JCTR) has a higher volatility of 11.40% compared to iShares MSCI ACWI Low Carbon Target ETF (CRBN) at 9.91%. This indicates that JCTR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CRBN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.