JCRAX vs. MCSFX

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

JCRAX (ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund) and MCSFX (MFS Commodity Strategy Fund) are both Commodities funds. Over the past 5 years, JCRAX returned 10.24%/yr vs 9.04%/yr for MCSFX. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JCRAX charges 1.36%/yr vs 1.89%/yr for MCSFX.

Performance

JCRAX vs. MCSFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with JCRAX having a 14.94% return and MCSFX slightly higher at 15.00%.

JCRAX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -3.12%
• 6M: 9.53%
• YTD: 14.94%
• 1Y: 29.49%
• 3Y*: 13.28%
• 5Y*: 10.24%
• 10Y*: 7.36%

MCSFX

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: -2.82%
• 6M: 10.11%
• YTD: 15.00%
• 1Y: 25.11%
• 3Y*: 11.95%
• 5Y*: 9.04%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCRAX vs. MCSFX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
JCRAX ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund	14.94%	25.30%	1.32%	-7.37%	12.82%	29.21%	2.15%	0.94%
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	15.00%	17.09%	4.32%	-7.25%	12.27%	26.40%	-1.34%	-1.69%

Correlation

The correlation between JCRAX and MCSFX is 0.91, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.91
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.91
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.91
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2019	0.90

The correlation between JCRAX and MCSFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.91 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

JCRAX vs. MCSFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCRAX

JCRAX Risk / Return Rank: 67
JCRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
JCRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
JCRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 73
JCRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 57
JCRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 53

MCSFX

MCSFX Risk / Return Rank: 47
MCSFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
MCSFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
MCSFX Omega Ratio Rank: 51
MCSFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
MCSFX Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCRAX vs. MCSFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JCRAX	MCSFX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.09	1.63	+0.47
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.70	2.17	+0.53
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.30	+0.06
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.33	2.03	+0.30
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.57	6.82	+1.75

JCRAX vs. MCSFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCRAX Sharpe Ratio is 2.09, which is comparable to the MCSFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCRAX and MCSFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JCRAX vs. MCSFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCRAX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than MCSFX's maximum drawdown of -37.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCRAX and MCSFX.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCRAX	MCSFX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-62.03%	-37.16%	-24.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-13.01%	-12.77%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-13.01%	-12.77%	-0.24%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.60%	-37.16%	+10.56%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-43.14%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.31%	-10.39%	+0.08%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-26.28%	-18.15%	-8.13%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.53%	3.79%	-0.26%

Volatility

JCRAX vs. MCSFX - Volatility Comparison

ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX) and MFS Commodity Strategy Fund (MCSFX) have volatilities of 3.71% and 3.54%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JCRAX	MCSFX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.71%	3.54%	+0.17%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.60%	13.29%	-1.69%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.47%	15.89%	-1.42%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.68%	34.11%	-13.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.07%	29.40%	-11.33%

JCRAX vs. MCSFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCRAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is lower than MCSFX's 1.89% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCRAX vs. MCSFX - Dividend Comparison

JCRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.66%, less than MCSFX's 13.08% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
JCRAX ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund	7.66%	8.80%	2.80%	3.29%	7.08%	22.43%	0.29%	0.90%	3.26%	2.44%	0.05%
MCSFX MFS Commodity Strategy Fund	13.08%	15.05%	2.25%	1.04%	26.24%	54.80%	0.15%	0.86%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCRAX and MCSFX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.91, JCRAX and MCSFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JCRAX or MCSFX?

JCRAX has higher volatility (3.71%) compared to MCSFX (3.54%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCRAX dropped -62.03% vs MCSFX's -37.16%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JCRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.