PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCRAX vs. FFGCX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCRAX vs. FFGCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JCRAX having a 24.94% return and FFGCX slightly lower at 24.64%. Over the past 10 years, JCRAX has underperformed FFGCX with an annualized return of 8.53%, while FFGCX has yielded a comparatively higher 13.04% annualized return.


JCRAX

1D
0.90%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
24.94%
6M
26.10%
1Y
45.59%
3Y*
17.82%
5Y*
11.92%
10Y*
8.53%

FFGCX

1D
1.30%
1M
0.79%
YTD
24.64%
6M
27.09%
1Y
52.31%
3Y*
20.10%
5Y*
13.70%
10Y*
13.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCRAX vs. FFGCX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JCRAX
ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund
24.94%25.30%1.32%-7.37%12.82%29.21%2.15%11.00%-14.54%4.58%
FFGCX
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund
24.64%28.66%2.98%-5.18%20.69%26.08%6.04%17.82%-13.21%17.18%

Correlation

The correlation between JCRAX and FFGCX is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.78

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.78

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2010

0.79

The correlation between JCRAX and FFGCX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.78 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCRAX vs. FFGCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCRAX
JCRAX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
JCRAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCRAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCRAX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JCRAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCRAX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FFGCX
FFGCX Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
FFGCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9393
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FFGCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
FFGCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8282
Omega Ratio Rank
FFGCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
FFGCX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCRAX vs. FFGCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCRAXFFGCXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.33

3.21

+0.12

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.15

4.04

+0.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.56

1.54

+0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

7.71

7.09

+0.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

27.87

25.64

+2.23

JCRAX vs. FFGCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCRAX Sharpe Ratio is 3.33, which is comparable to the FFGCX Sharpe Ratio of 3.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCRAX and FFGCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCRAXFFGCXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.33

3.21

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.64

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.47

0.58

-0.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.23

0.35

-0.12

Drawdowns

JCRAX vs. FFGCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCRAX drawdown since its inception was -62.03%, which is greater than FFGCX's maximum drawdown of -57.23%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCRAX and FFGCX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCRAXFFGCXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.03%

-57.23%

-4.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.04%

-7.38%

+1.34%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-11.86%

-19.24%

+7.38%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.60%

-27.22%

+0.62%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-43.14%

-48.43%

+5.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.50%

-1.58%

-0.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-26.39%

-19.37%

-7.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.67%

2.04%

-0.37%

Volatility

JCRAX vs. FFGCX - Volatility Comparison

ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund (JCRAX) and Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund (FFGCX) have volatilities of 4.26% and 4.35%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCRAXFFGCXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.26%

4.35%

-0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.36%

13.28%

-1.92%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.08%

16.34%

-2.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.66%

21.37%

-0.71%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.11%

22.43%

-4.32%

JCRAX vs. FFGCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCRAX has a 1.36% expense ratio, which is higher than FFGCX's 0.94% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCRAX vs. FFGCX - Dividend Comparison

JCRAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.05%, more than FFGCX's 2.03% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FFGCX
Fidelity Global Commodity Stock Fund
2.03%2.53%2.62%2.01%1.84%3.39%1.61%2.98%2.22%0.36%1.53%2.86%
JCRAX
ALPS/CoreCommodity Management CompleteCommoditiesSM Strategy Fund
7.05%8.80%2.80%3.29%7.08%22.43%0.29%0.90%3.26%2.44%0.05%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCRAX and FFGCX have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FFGCX has higher volatility (4.35%) compared to JCRAX (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCRAX dropped -62.03% vs FFGCX's -57.23%.

JCRAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.33 vs 3.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCRAX and FFGCX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer