PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCPB vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCPB vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCPB achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 75.49% return.


JCPB

1D
-0.17%
1M
0.36%
YTD
0.58%
6M
0.54%
1Y
6.11%
3Y*
5.02%
5Y*
1.11%
10Y*

UGA

1D
-0.19%
1M
-12.35%
YTD
75.49%
6M
64.35%
1Y
80.94%
3Y*
22.21%
5Y*
25.10%
10Y*
14.43%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCPB vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
0.58%7.98%2.96%7.13%-12.90%-0.51%9.19%7.76%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
75.49%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%32.57%

Correlation

The correlation between JCPB and UGA is -0.41, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.21

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.13

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019

-0.11

Over the past year, the inverse relationship between JCPB and UGA has strengthened: their correlation has moved from -0.11 to -0.41, meaning they now move in opposite directions more often than their long-term average.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCPB vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCPB
JCPB Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
JCPB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCPB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4949
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCPB Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
JCPB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4545
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCPB Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCPB vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCPBUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.69

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.37

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.26

5.47

-3.21

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.88

13.25

-6.37

JCPB vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCPB Sharpe Ratio is 1.63, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCPB and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCPBUGADifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.63

2.32

-0.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

0.73

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.55

0.12

+0.43

Drawdowns

JCPB vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCPB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPB and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCPBUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.67%

-86.59%

+69.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.71%

-14.88%

+12.17%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.97%

-26.68%

+20.71%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.67%

-38.11%

+21.44%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.48%

-12.35%

+10.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.26%

-36.76%

+32.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.89%

6.13%

-5.24%

Volatility

JCPB vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) is 1.26%, while United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a volatility of 11.66%. This indicates that JCPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCPBUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.26%

11.66%

-10.40%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.72%

30.41%

-27.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.77%

35.14%

-31.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.38%

34.38%

-29.00%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.05%

37.27%

-32.22%

JCPB vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCPB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCPB vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
JCPB
JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF
4.93%4.90%5.16%4.32%3.01%2.19%2.97%3.01%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCPB and UGA have a correlation of -0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to JCPB (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPB dropped -16.67% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 25.10% vs 1.11% for JCPB. On fees, JCPB is cheaper at 0.38% per year. On volatility, JCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 25.10% return vs 1.11%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JCPB is cheaper with a 0.38% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.

JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

JCPB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while UGA is Oil & Gas. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for JCPB and 0.75% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.63), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCPB and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer