JCPB vs. FLCO
JCPB (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF) and FLCO (Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JCPB is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while FLCO is a Corporate Bonds fund actively managed by Franklin Templeton. Both are actively managed. Over the past 5 years, JCPB returned 1.11%/yr vs 0.17%/yr for FLCO. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JCPB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for FLCO.
Performance
JCPB vs. FLCO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JCPB achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than FLCO's 0.40% return.
JCPB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
FLCO
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.57%
- YTD
- 0.40%
- 6M
- 0.31%
- 1Y
- 5.64%
- 3Y*
- 4.97%
- 5Y*
- 0.17%
- 10Y*
- —
JCPB vs. FLCO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.58% | 7.98% | 2.96% | 7.13% | -12.90% | -0.51% | 9.19% | 7.76% |
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 0.40% | 7.53% | 1.93% | 7.94% | -16.08% | -2.06% | 10.01% | 12.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCPB and FLCO is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2019 | 0.81 |
The correlation between JCPB and FLCO shifts across timeframes, from 0.81 (all time) to 0.94 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
JCPB vs. FLCO - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JCPB
FLCO
Communication Services
Financial Services
Technology
Real Estate
-
Healthcare
Utilities
-
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Basic Materials
Communication Services
JCPB
FLCO
Financial Services
JCPB
FLCO
Technology
JCPB
FLCO
Real Estate
JCPB
FLCO
-
Healthcare
JCPB
FLCO
Utilities
JCPB
FLCO
-
Energy
JCPB
FLCO
Consumer Cyclical
JCPB
FLCO
Industrials
JCPB
FLCO
Consumer Defensive
JCPB
FLCO
Basic Materials
JCPB
FLCO
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCPB vs. FLCO — Risk / Return Rank
JCPB
FLCO
JCPB vs. FLCO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JCPB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.35 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.22 | +0.07 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | 2.05 | +0.21 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | 6.16 | +0.71 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCPB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | 1.28 | +0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | 0.02 | +0.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.32 | +0.23 |
Drawdowns
JCPB vs. FLCO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCPB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, smaller than the maximum FLCO drawdown of -22.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPB and FLCO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCPB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -22.71% | +6.04% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | -2.76% | +0.05% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.97% | -6.59% | +0.62% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | -22.48% | +5.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -2.37% | +0.89% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -5.88% | +1.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | 0.92% | -0.03% |
Volatility
JCPB vs. FLCO - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) is 1.26%, while Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF (FLCO) has a volatility of 1.44%. This indicates that JCPB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FLCO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCPB | FLCO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | 1.44% | -0.18% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | 3.24% | -0.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 4.42% | -0.65% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 7.15% | -1.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 6.83% | -1.78% |
JCPB vs. FLCO - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCPB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than FLCO's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
JCPB vs. FLCO - Dividend Comparison
JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than FLCO's 4.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FLCO Franklin Liberty Investment Grade Corporate ETF | 4.66% | 4.60% | 4.63% | 3.83% | 3.85% | 2.85% | 3.99% | 3.39% | 3.86% | 3.33% | 0.51% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.93% | 4.90% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.97% | 3.01% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, JCPB and FLCO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
FLCO has higher volatility (1.44%) compared to JCPB (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCPB dropped -16.67% vs FLCO's -22.71%.
On 5-year performance, JCPB leads with 1.11% vs 0.17% for FLCO. On fees, FLCO is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JCPB has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, JCPB has performed better with a 1.11% return vs 0.17%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
FLCO is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.
JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 4.66% for FLCO.
JCPB is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while FLCO is Corporate Bonds. They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Franklin Templeton. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for JCPB and 0.35% for FLCO.
JCPB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.63 vs 1.28), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JCPB and FLCO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer