JCPB vs. BNDP
JCPB (JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF) and BNDP (Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF) are both Intermediate Core-Plus Bond funds. JCPB is actively managed, while BNDP is passively managed. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. JCPB charges 0.38%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for BNDP.
Performance
JCPB vs. BNDP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JCPB achieves a 0.58% return, which is significantly higher than BNDP's 0.34% return.
JCPB
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 0.36%
- YTD
- 0.58%
- 6M
- 0.54%
- 1Y
- 6.11%
- 3Y*
- 5.02%
- 5Y*
- 1.11%
- 10Y*
- —
BNDP
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.34%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JCPB vs. BNDP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 0.58% | 0.13% |
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 0.34% | 0.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCPB and BNDP is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 5, 2025 | 0.97 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCPB vs. BNDP — Risk / Return Rank
JCPB
BNDP
JCPB vs. BNDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF (JCPB) and Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF (BNDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JCPB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.88 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCPB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.63 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.21 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.55 | 0.25 | +0.30 |
Drawdowns
JCPB vs. BNDP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCPB drawdown since its inception was -16.67%, which is greater than BNDP's maximum drawdown of -2.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCPB and BNDP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCPB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.67% | -2.60% | -14.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.71% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -5.97% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.67% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.48% | -1.31% | -0.17% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.26% | -0.86% | -3.40% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.89% | — | — |
Volatility
JCPB vs. BNDP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCPB | BNDP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.26% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.72% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.77% | 3.63% | +0.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.38% | 3.63% | +1.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.05% | 3.63% | +1.42% |
JCPB vs. BNDP - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCPB has a 0.38% expense ratio, which is higher than BNDP's 0.05% expense ratio.
Dividends
JCPB vs. BNDP - Dividend Comparison
JCPB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.93%, more than BNDP's 2.08% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BNDP Vanguard Core-Plus Bond Index ETF | 2.08% | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JCPB JPMorgan Core Plus Bond ETF | 4.93% | 4.90% | 5.16% | 4.32% | 3.01% | 2.19% | 2.97% | 3.01% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.97, JCPB and BNDP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, BNDP is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BNDP is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for JCPB.
JCPB has the higher dividend yield at 4.93%, compared with 2.08% for BNDP.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.38% for JCPB and 0.05% for BNDP.
Find the right allocation for JCPB and BNDP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer