PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCHI vs. JQUA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCHI vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a -5.00% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 12.99% return.


JCHI

1D
-0.24%
1M
-5.91%
YTD
-5.00%
6M
-5.85%
1Y
7.72%
3Y*
7.47%
5Y*
10Y*

JQUA

1D
1.04%
1M
0.87%
YTD
12.99%
6M
11.49%
1Y
21.51%
3Y*
19.66%
5Y*
13.32%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCHI vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
-5.00%27.66%13.77%-17.31%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
12.99%11.69%21.21%23.98%

Correlation

The correlation between JCHI and JQUA is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.46

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 16, 2023

0.36

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCHI vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCHI
JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

JQUA
JQUA Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
JQUA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JQUA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
JQUA Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
JQUA Calmar Ratio Rank: 7070
Calmar Ratio Rank
JQUA Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCHI vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JCHIJQUADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.37

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.09

1.31

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.54

3.03

-2.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.21

12.31

-11.10

JCHI vs. JQUA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.43, which is lower than the JQUA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCHI and JQUA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JCHI vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, smaller than the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and JQUA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCHIJQUADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-32.92%

+3.35%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.37%

-7.13%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

-16.81%

-10.66%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-22.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-12.47%

-1.29%

-11.18%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.27%

-4.14%

-9.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.41%

1.75%

+4.66%

Volatility

JCHI vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) has a higher volatility of 6.09% compared to JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) at 5.30%. This indicates that JCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JQUA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCHIJQUADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.09%

5.30%

+0.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.12%

9.48%

+3.64%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.99%

11.98%

+6.01%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.79%

15.74%

+9.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.79%

18.00%

+6.79%

JCHI vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCHI vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison

JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.91%, more than JQUA's 1.10% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
1.91%1.81%2.12%2.13%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
JQUA
JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF
1.10%1.19%1.24%1.21%1.60%1.32%1.44%1.67%2.10%0.40%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCHI and JQUA have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCHI has higher volatility (6.09%) compared to JQUA (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCHI dropped -29.57% vs JQUA's -32.92%.

On 3-year performance, JQUA leads with 19.66% vs 7.47% for JCHI. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JQUA has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 19.66% return vs 7.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JCHI.

JCHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.91%, compared with 1.10% for JQUA.

JCHI is categorized as China Equities, while JQUA is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.12% for JQUA.

JQUA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.81 vs 0.43), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCHI and JQUA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer