PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCHI vs. JPLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCHI vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a 0.59% return, which is significantly lower than JPLD's 1.04% return.


JCHI

1D
-1.80%
1M
0.06%
YTD
0.59%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
8.80%
5Y*
10Y*

JPLD

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.19%
YTD
1.04%
6M
1.37%
1Y
4.71%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCHI vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
0.59%27.66%13.77%-18.20%
JPLD
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF
1.04%6.01%6.49%3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between JCHI and JPLD is 0.10, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.10

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023

0.04

JCHI vs. JPLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
JCHI
JPLD

Consumer Cyclical

20.6%
1.6%

Financial Services

20.6%
13.7%

Technology

14.7%
7.4%

Communication Services

14.5%
10.1%

Industrials

10.7%
0.1%

Basic Materials

6.7%
1.4%

Healthcare

4.7%
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

4.1%
0.1%

Energy

3.3%
0.1%

Real Estate

-

7.8%

Utilities

-

0.4%

Consumer Cyclical

JCHI
20.6%
JPLD
1.6%

Financial Services

JCHI
20.6%
JPLD
13.7%

Technology

JCHI
14.7%
JPLD
7.4%

Communication Services

JCHI
14.5%
JPLD
10.1%

Industrials

JCHI
10.7%
JPLD
0.1%

Basic Materials

JCHI
6.7%
JPLD
1.4%

Healthcare

JCHI
4.7%
JPLD
5.6%

Consumer Defensive

JCHI
4.1%
JPLD
0.1%

Energy

JCHI
3.3%
JPLD
0.1%

Real Estate

JCHI

-

JPLD
7.8%

Utilities

JCHI

-

JPLD
0.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCHI vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCHI
JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

JPLD
JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 9191
Overall Rank
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9090
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCHI vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCHIJPLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-3.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.68

-0.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.25

4.71

-3.46

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.04

21.78

-18.74

JCHI vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCHI Sharpe Ratio is 1.02, which is lower than the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCHI and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCHIJPLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.02

3.22

-2.20

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.25

3.25

-3.00

Drawdowns

JCHI vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and JPLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCHIJPLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.57%

-1.17%

-28.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.37%

-1.00%

-13.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.47%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.33%

-0.12%

-7.21%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.34%

-0.15%

-13.19%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.91%

0.22%

+5.69%

Volatility

JCHI vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) has a higher volatility of 6.29% compared to J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.37%. This indicates that JCHI's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCHIJPLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.29%

0.37%

+5.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.33%

0.97%

+11.36%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.60%

1.47%

+16.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.88%

1.83%

+23.05%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.88%

1.83%

+23.05%

JCHI vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCHI vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than JPLD's 4.21% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
JCHI
JPMorgan Active China ETF
1.80%1.81%2.12%2.13%
JPLD
J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF
4.21%4.24%4.47%1.83%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCHI and JPLD have a correlation of 0.10, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JCHI has higher volatility (6.29%) compared to JPLD (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCHI dropped -29.57% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

On 1-year performance, JCHI leads with 17.94% vs 4.71% for JPLD. On fees, JPLD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, JCHI has performed better with a 17.94% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JPLD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for JCHI.

JPLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.80% for JCHI.

JCHI is categorized as China Equities, while JPLD is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.24% for JPLD.

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 1.02), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCHI and JPLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer