JCHI vs. CGRO

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

JCHI (JPMorgan Active China ETF) and CGRO (CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF) are both China Equities funds. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JCHI returned 16.23% vs -12.15% for CGRO. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for CGRO.

Performance

JCHI vs. CGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCHI achieves a 0.50% return, which is significantly higher than CGRO's -15.64% return.

JCHI

• 1D: -0.09%
• 1M: -0.31%
• YTD: 0.50%
• 6M: -0.36%
• 1Y: 16.23%
• 3Y*: 8.99%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CGRO

• 1D: -0.69%
• 1M: -6.61%
• YTD: -15.64%
• 6M: -16.66%
• 1Y: -12.15%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCHI vs. CGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	0.50%	27.66%	13.77%	-3.79%
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	-15.64%	20.23%	14.75%	2.03%

Correlation

The correlation between JCHI and CGRO is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 18, 2023	0.90

The correlation between JCHI and CGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.90 - a consistent structural relationship.

JCHI vs. CGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JCHI	CGRO
Consumer Cyclical	20.6%	43.9%
Financial Services	20.6%	3.3%
Technology	14.7%	14.8%
Communication Services	14.5%	13.3%
Industrials	10.7%	15.6%
Basic Materials	6.7%	-
Healthcare	4.7%	5.7%
Consumer Defensive	4.1%	2.3%
Energy	3.3%	-
Real Estate	-	1.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

JCHI vs. CGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCHI

JCHI Risk / Return Rank: 25
JCHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 26
JCHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 26
JCHI Omega Ratio Rank: 26
JCHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 25
JCHI Martin Ratio Rank: 22

CGRO

CGRO Risk / Return Rank: 5
CGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
CGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
CGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
CGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCHI vs. CGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JCHI	CGRO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.93	-0.55	+1.48
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.40	-0.66	+2.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.17	0.93	+0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.13	-0.44	+1.57
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.74	-0.83	+3.57
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JCHI vs. CGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCHI Sharpe Ratio is 0.93, which is higher than the CGRO Sharpe Ratio of -0.55. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCHI and CGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JCHI	CGRO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93	-0.55	+1.48
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.23	+0.01

Drawdowns

JCHI vs. CGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than CGRO's maximum drawdown of -27.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and CGRO.

Drawdown Indicators

	JCHI	CGRO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-29.57%	-27.90%	-1.67%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.37%	-27.90%	+13.53%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-27.47%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.41%	-27.90%	+20.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-13.33%	-10.25%	-3.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.93%	14.67%	-8.74%

Volatility

JCHI vs. CGRO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) is 6.28%, while CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF (CGRO) has a volatility of 7.68%. This indicates that JCHI experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JCHI	CGRO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.28%	7.68%	-1.40%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.32%	15.54%	-3.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.59%	22.47%	-4.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.86%	28.97%	-4.11%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.86%	28.97%	-4.11%

JCHI vs. CGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CGRO's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

JCHI vs. CGRO - Dividend Comparison

JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, less than CGRO's 3.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
CGRO CoreValues Alpha Greater China Growth ETF	3.32%	2.48%	2.47%	0.21%
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF	1.80%	1.81%	2.12%	2.13%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JCHI and CGRO in my portfolio?

JCHI and CGRO have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JCHI or CGRO?

CGRO has higher volatility (7.68%) compared to JCHI (6.28%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCHI dropped -29.57% vs CGRO's -27.90%.

Which ETF is better, JCHI or CGRO?

On 1-year performance, JCHI leads with 16.23% vs -12.15% for CGRO. On fees, JCHI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, JCHI has been the lower-risk option at 6.28%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JCHI or CGRO?

Over the 1-year period, JCHI has performed better with a 16.23% return vs -12.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JCHI or CGRO?

JCHI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for CGRO.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JCHI or CGRO?

CGRO has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 1.80% for JCHI.

What is the main difference between JCHI and CGRO?

They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and CoreValues Alpha. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.75% for CGRO.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JCHI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.93 vs -0.55), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.