JCHI vs. CAS
JCHI (JPMorgan Active China ETF) and CAS (Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF) are both China Equities funds. Both are actively managed. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JCHI charges 0.65%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for CAS.
Performance
JCHI vs. CAS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
JCHI
- 1D
- -0.09%
- 1M
- -0.31%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- -0.36%
- 1Y
- 16.23%
- 3Y*
- 8.99%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CAS
- 1D
- 0.05%
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JCHI vs. CAS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF | 0.47% |
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | -1.61% |
Correlation
The correlation between JCHI and CAS is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026 | 0.30 |
JCHI vs. CAS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JCHI
CAS
Consumer Cyclical
-
Financial Services
Technology
-
Communication Services
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
Healthcare
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
JCHI
CAS
-
Financial Services
JCHI
CAS
Technology
JCHI
CAS
-
Communication Services
JCHI
CAS
-
Industrials
JCHI
CAS
-
Basic Materials
JCHI
CAS
-
Healthcare
JCHI
CAS
-
Consumer Defensive
JCHI
CAS
-
Energy
JCHI
CAS
-
Real Estate
JCHI
-
CAS
-
Utilities
JCHI
-
CAS
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JCHI vs. CAS — Risk / Return Rank
JCHI
CAS
JCHI vs. CAS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active China ETF (JCHI) and Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF (CAS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JCHI | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.13 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.74 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JCHI | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.93 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.25 | -3.41 | +3.65 |
Drawdowns
JCHI vs. CAS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JCHI drawdown since its inception was -29.57%, which is greater than CAS's maximum drawdown of -2.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCHI and CAS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JCHI | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.57% | -2.59% | -26.98% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.37% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.47% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.41% | -1.61% | -5.80% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.33% | -1.70% | -11.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.93% | — | — |
Volatility
JCHI vs. CAS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JCHI | CAS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.32% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.59% | 18.33% | -0.74% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 18.33% | +6.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.86% | 18.33% | +6.53% |
JCHI vs. CAS - Expense Ratio Comparison
JCHI has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CAS's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
JCHI vs. CAS - Dividend Comparison
JCHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.80%, while CAS has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
CAS Simplify China A Shares PLUS Income ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JCHI JPMorgan Active China ETF | 1.80% | 1.81% | 2.12% | 2.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JCHI and CAS have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, JCHI is cheaper at 0.65% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
JCHI is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for CAS.
JCHI has the higher dividend yield at 1.80%, compared with 0.00% for CAS.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for JCHI and 0.88% for CAS.
Find the right allocation for JCHI and CAS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer