PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JCBCX vs. MUJ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JCBCX vs. MUJ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C (JCBCX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JCBCX achieves a 0.70% return, which is significantly lower than MUJ's 4.64% return. Over the past 10 years, JCBCX has underperformed MUJ with an annualized return of 0.93%, while MUJ has yielded a comparatively higher 2.47% annualized return.


JCBCX

1D
0.20%
1M
0.59%
YTD
0.70%
6M
0.81%
1Y
5.06%
3Y*
2.53%
5Y*
0.20%
10Y*
0.93%

MUJ

1D
-0.49%
1M
1.10%
YTD
4.64%
6M
4.23%
1Y
18.31%
3Y*
8.52%
5Y*
-0.02%
10Y*
2.47%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JCBCX vs. MUJ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
JCBCX
JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C
0.70%2.85%0.87%4.30%-7.11%-0.68%3.42%5.13%0.66%2.97%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
4.64%13.86%2.28%7.55%-26.31%15.20%5.95%18.95%-8.49%9.99%

Correlation

The correlation between JCBCX and MUJ is 0.36, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.36

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.44

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.42

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.37

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 22, 2005

0.28

The correlation between JCBCX and MUJ shifts across timeframes, from 0.28 (all time) to 0.44 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JCBCX vs. MUJ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JCBCX
JCBCX Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
JCBCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6565
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JCBCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JCBCX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
JCBCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
JCBCX Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

MUJ
MUJ Risk / Return Rank: 4444
Overall Rank
MUJ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5050
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MUJ Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
MUJ Omega Ratio Rank: 5555
Omega Ratio Rank
MUJ Calmar Ratio Rank: 2828
Calmar Ratio Rank
MUJ Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JCBCX vs. MUJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C (JCBCX) and BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JCBCXMUJDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.51

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.58

1.41

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

1.96

-0.08

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.15

7.91

-1.76

JCBCX vs. MUJ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JCBCX Sharpe Ratio is 2.39, which is comparable to the MUJ Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JCBCX and MUJ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JCBCXMUJDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.39

2.09

+0.31

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.07

-0.00

+0.07

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.29

0.22

+0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.73

0.35

+0.38

Drawdowns

JCBCX vs. MUJ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JCBCX drawdown since its inception was -11.44%, smaller than the maximum MUJ drawdown of -41.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JCBCX and MUJ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JCBCXMUJDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-11.44%

-41.72%

+30.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.72%

-9.41%

+6.69%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-4.77%

-12.17%

+7.40%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-11.28%

-32.71%

+21.43%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.44%

-32.71%

+21.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-3.46%

+2.49%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.07%

-9.04%

+6.97%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.82%

2.32%

-1.50%

Volatility

JCBCX vs. MUJ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C (JCBCX) is 0.90%, while BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund (MUJ) has a volatility of 2.82%. This indicates that JCBCX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JCBCXMUJDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.90%

2.82%

-1.92%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.67%

6.90%

-5.23%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.14%

8.82%

-6.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

2.90%

10.35%

-7.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

3.28%

11.20%

-7.92%

JCBCX vs. MUJ - Expense Ratio Comparison

JCBCX has a 1.05% expense ratio, which is lower than MUJ's 2.26% expense ratio.


Dividends

JCBCX vs. MUJ - Dividend Comparison

JCBCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, less than MUJ's 5.32% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JCBCX
JPMorgan California Tax Free Bond Fund Class C
2.54%2.39%2.35%1.90%1.38%0.95%1.08%1.72%2.16%2.09%1.99%2.51%
MUJ
BlackRock MuniHoldings New Jersey Quality Fund
5.32%5.45%5.53%4.13%6.40%4.77%4.78%4.03%5.34%5.55%6.00%5.69%

Frequently Asked Questions


JCBCX and MUJ have a correlation of 0.36, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

MUJ has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to JCBCX (0.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JCBCX dropped -11.44% vs MUJ's -41.72%.

JCBCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 2.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JCBCX and MUJ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer