PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBS vs. LNT
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

JBS vs. LNT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JBS N.V. (JBS) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBS achieves a 7.04% return, which is significantly lower than LNT's 10.75% return.


JBS

1D
0.42%
1M
20.59%
6M
-1.75%
YTD
7.04%
1Y
15.19%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.51%

LNT

1D
-1.54%
1M
-7.08%
6M
8.55%
YTD
10.75%
1Y
12.48%
3Y*
13.14%
5Y*
7.19%
10Y*
9.11%
ALL TIME*
10.14%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$75.68M$62.44M$94.87M
$179.75M$177.35M$185.20M

JBS vs. LNT - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
JBS
JBS N.V.
7.04%5.64%
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
10.75%7.29%

Correlation

The correlation between JBS and LNT is 0.21, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 13, 2025

0.15

Fundamentals

Market Cap

JBS:

$31.70B

LNT:

$18.31B

EPS

JBS:

R$6.64

LNT:

$2.94

PE Ratio

JBS:

11.01

LNT:

24.11

PEG Ratio

JBS:

0.03

LNT:

4.95

PS Ratio

JBS:

0.22

LNT:

4.15

Total Revenue (TTM)

JBS:

R$477.26B

LNT:

$4.42B

Gross Profit (TTM)

JBS:

R$58.78B

LNT:

$2.26B

EBITDA (TTM)

JBS:

R$34.13B

LNT:

$2.00B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBS vs. LNT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

JBS
JBS Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
JBS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBS Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBS Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
JBS Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBS Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

LNT
LNT Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
LNT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LNT Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
LNT Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
LNT Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
LNT Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

JBS vs. LNT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JBS N.V. (JBS) and Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JBSLNTDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.31

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.28

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

1.14

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.48

1.37

-0.89

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.93

3.93

-3.00

JBS vs. LNT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBS Sharpe Ratio is 0.46, which is lower than the LNT Sharpe Ratio of 0.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBS and LNT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JBS vs. LNT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBS drawdown since its inception was -31.86%, smaller than the maximum LNT drawdown of -51.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBS and LNT.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBSLNTDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-31.86%

-51.66%

+19.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.86%

-9.15%

-22.71%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.25%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.60%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-16.21%

-9.15%

-7.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-12.66%

-8.73%

-3.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.42%

3.18%

+13.24%

Volatility

JBS vs. LNT - Volatility Comparison

JBS N.V. (JBS) has a higher volatility of 11.66% compared to Alliant Energy Corporation (LNT) at 6.58%. This indicates that JBS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LNT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBSLNTDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.66%

6.58%

+5.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.31%

13.35%

+12.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.11%

16.29%

+16.82%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

33.64%

19.82%

+13.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.64%

21.24%

+12.40%

Dividends

JBS vs. LNT - Dividend Comparison

JBS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.00%, more than LNT's 2.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JBS
JBS N.V.
7.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
LNT
Alliant Energy Corporation
2.94%3.12%3.25%3.53%3.10%2.62%2.95%2.60%3.17%2.96%3.10%3.52%

Financials

JBS vs. LNT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between JBS N.V. and Alliant Energy Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items

JBS vs. LNT - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between JBS N.V. and Alliant Energy Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

JBS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JBS N.V. reported a gross profit of 11.61B and revenue of 111.47B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.4%.

LNT - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.00B and revenue of 1.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 84.8%.

JBS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JBS N.V. reported an operating income of 2.42B and revenue of 111.47B, resulting in an operating margin of 2.2%.

LNT - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported an operating income of 249.00M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

JBS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, JBS N.V. reported a net income of 1.14B and revenue of 111.47B, resulting in a net margin of 1.0%.

LNT - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Alliant Energy Corporation reported a net income of 163.00M and revenue of 1.18B, resulting in a net margin of 13.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


JBS and LNT have a correlation of 0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

JBS has higher volatility (11.66%) compared to LNT (6.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBS dropped -31.86% vs LNT's -51.66%.

LNT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.77 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBS and LNT

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer