JBND vs. NUAG
JBND (Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF) and NUAG (Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds. JBND is actively managed, while NUAG is passively managed. Over the past year, JBND returned 5.68% vs 5.90% for NUAG. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JBND charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for NUAG.
Performance
JBND vs. NUAG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBND achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly lower than NUAG's 0.50% return.
JBND
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.27%
- YTD
- 0.22%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 5.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
NUAG
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 0.41%
- YTD
- 0.50%
- 6M
- 0.32%
- 1Y
- 5.90%
- 3Y*
- 4.89%
- 5Y*
- 0.47%
- 10Y*
- —
JBND vs. NUAG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF | 0.22% | 8.21% | 3.19% | 7.76% |
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 0.50% | 7.37% | 2.02% | 8.34% |
Correlation
The correlation between JBND and NUAG is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2023 | 0.93 |
The correlation between JBND and NUAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JBND vs. NUAG — Risk / Return Rank
JBND
NUAG
JBND vs. NUAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JBND | NUAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.16 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.30 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.94 | 2.33 | -0.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.97 | 7.06 | -1.09 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JBND | NUAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.49 | 1.65 | -0.16 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.08 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.53 | 0.31 | +1.22 |
Drawdowns
JBND vs. NUAG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBND drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, smaller than the maximum NUAG drawdown of -19.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBND and NUAG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JBND | NUAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -4.48% | -19.79% | +15.31% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.94% | -2.54% | -0.40% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -19.19% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.74% | -1.23% | -0.51% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.15% | -4.95% | +3.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.95% | 0.84% | +0.11% |
Volatility
JBND vs. NUAG - Volatility Comparison
Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (NUAG) have volatilities of 1.20% and 1.15%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JBND | NUAG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.20% | 1.15% | +0.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.67% | 2.59% | +0.08% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.82% | 3.58% | +0.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 6.01% | -1.17% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 4.84% | 5.49% | -0.65% |
JBND vs. NUAG - Expense Ratio Comparison
JBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than NUAG's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
JBND vs. NUAG - Dividend Comparison
JBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, less than NUAG's 4.50% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF | 4.41% | 4.42% | 4.58% | 1.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
NUAG Nuveen Enhanced Yield U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF | 4.50% | 4.43% | 4.44% | 3.95% | 3.60% | 2.27% | 2.93% | 3.54% | 3.79% | 3.38% | 0.48% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, JBND and NUAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
JBND has higher volatility (1.20%) compared to NUAG (1.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBND dropped -4.48% vs NUAG's -19.79%.
On 1-year performance, NUAG leads with 5.90% vs 5.68% for JBND. On fees, NUAG is cheaper at 0.19% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, NUAG has performed better with a 5.90% return vs 5.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
NUAG is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JBND.
NUAG has the higher dividend yield at 4.50%, compared with 4.41% for JBND.
They also come from different issuers: JPMorgan and Nuveen. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JBND and 0.19% for NUAG.
NUAG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.65 vs 1.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JBND and NUAG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer