JBND vs. BBAG

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JBND (Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF) and BBAG (JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF) are both Intermediate Core Bond funds from JPMorgan. JBND is actively managed, while BBAG is passively managed. Over the past year, JBND returned 5.68% vs 5.12% for BBAG. Their correlation of 0.94 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JBND charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for BBAG.

Performance

JBND vs. BBAG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBND achieves a 0.22% return, which is significantly higher than BBAG's 0.17% return.

JBND

• 1D: -0.19%
• 1M: 0.27%
• YTD: 0.22%
• 6M: 0.25%
• 1Y: 5.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BBAG

• 1D: -0.23%
• 1M: 0.21%
• YTD: 0.17%
• 6M: 0.02%
• 1Y: 5.12%
• 3Y*: 3.86%
• 5Y*: -0.01%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBND vs. BBAG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF	0.22%	8.21%	3.19%	7.76%
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	0.17%	7.27%	1.26%	7.42%

Correlation

The correlation between JBND and BBAG is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.93
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 13, 2023	0.94

The correlation between JBND and BBAG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

JBND vs. BBAG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JBND	BBAG
Communication Services	25.7%	46.6%
Technology	19.7%	12.0%
Financial Services	9.0%	6.5%
Healthcare	3.1%	2.6%
Real Estate	2.6%	6.8%
Basic Materials	0.8%	0.5%
Utilities	0.7%	2.3%
Energy	0.6%	1.2%
Industrials	0.5%	1.6%
Consumer Cyclical	0.3%	1.6%
Consumer Defensive	0.1%	1.0%

Return for Risk

JBND vs. BBAG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBND

JBND Risk / Return Rank: 40
JBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 41
JBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 44
JBND Omega Ratio Rank: 39
JBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 39
JBND Martin Ratio Rank: 37

BBAG

BBAG Risk / Return Rank: 37
BBAG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 37
BBAG Sortino Ratio Rank: 38
BBAG Omega Ratio Rank: 35
BBAG Calmar Ratio Rank: 38
BBAG Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBND vs. BBAG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JBND	BBAG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.49	1.31	+0.18
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.23	1.96	+0.27
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.26	1.23	+0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.94	1.85	+0.08
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	5.97	5.54	+0.43
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JBND vs. BBAG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.49, which is comparable to the BBAG Sharpe Ratio of 1.31. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBND and BBAG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JBND	BBAG	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.49	1.31	+0.18
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.00	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.53	0.32	+1.21

Drawdowns

JBND vs. BBAG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBND drawdown since its inception was -4.48%, smaller than the maximum BBAG drawdown of -18.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBND and BBAG.

Drawdown Indicators

	JBND	BBAG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-4.48%	-18.73%	+14.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.94%	-2.78%	-0.16%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-6.18%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-18.06%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.74%	-2.84%	+1.10%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.15%	-6.22%	+5.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.95%	0.93%	+0.02%

Volatility

JBND vs. BBAG - Volatility Comparison

Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF (JBND) and JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF (BBAG) have volatilities of 1.20% and 1.24%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JBND	BBAG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.20%	1.24%	-0.04%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.67%	2.82%	-0.15%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.82%	3.92%	-0.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	4.84%	5.93%	-1.09%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	4.84%	5.80%	-0.96%

JBND vs. BBAG - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBND has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is higher than BBAG's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

JBND vs. BBAG - Dividend Comparison

JBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.41%, which matches BBAG's 4.37% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
BBAG JPMorgan BetaBuilders U.S. Aggregate Bond ETF	4.37%	4.29%	4.25%	3.60%	2.23%	1.44%	2.26%	2.92%	0.16%
JBND Jpmorgan Active Bond ETF	4.41%	4.42%	4.58%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JBND and BBAG in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, JBND and BBAG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, JBND or BBAG?

BBAG has higher volatility (1.24%) compared to JBND (1.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBND dropped -4.48% vs BBAG's -18.73%.

Which ETF is better, JBND or BBAG?

On 1-year performance, JBND leads with 5.68% vs 5.12% for BBAG. On fees, BBAG is cheaper at 0.03% per year. Their volatility is very similar. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JBND or BBAG?

Over the 1-year period, JBND has performed better with a 5.68% return vs 5.12%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JBND or BBAG?

BBAG is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for JBND.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JBND or BBAG?

JBND has the higher dividend yield at 4.41%, compared with 4.37% for BBAG.

What is the main difference between JBND and BBAG?

Their fees differ too: 0.30% for JBND and 0.03% for BBAG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JBND currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.