JBBB vs. RAAA
JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) and RAAA (Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF) are both CLO funds. Both are actively managed. At a correlation of -0.08, they often move in opposite directions. JBBB charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for RAAA.
Performance
JBBB vs. RAAA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 1.86% return, which is significantly lower than RAAA's 2.18% return.
JBBB
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- 0.62%
- YTD
- 1.86%
- 6M
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- 5.67%
- 3Y*
- 10.60%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
RAAA
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.50%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JBBB vs. RAAA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 1.86% | 2.64% |
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF | 2.18% | 2.46% |
Correlation
The correlation between JBBB and RAAA is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025 | -0.08 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JBBB vs. RAAA — Risk / Return Rank
JBBB
RAAA
JBBB vs. RAAA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF (RAAA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JBBB | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.31 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.84 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JBBB | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.70 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.31 | 3.76 | -2.45 |
Drawdowns
JBBB vs. RAAA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, which is greater than RAAA's maximum drawdown of -0.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and RAAA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JBBB | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.57% | -0.71% | -9.86% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -2.46% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -3.82% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.23% | +0.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.58% | -0.06% | -1.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.72% | — | — |
Volatility
JBBB vs. RAAA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JBBB | RAAA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.45% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.76% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.34% | 1.39% | +1.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 1.39% | +3.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 5.26% | 1.39% | +3.87% |
JBBB vs. RAAA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than RAAA's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
JBBB vs. RAAA - Dividend Comparison
JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.13%, more than RAAA's 4.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF | 7.13% | 8.41% | 9.24% | 8.71% | 5.71% |
RAAA Reckoner Leveraged AAA CLO ETF | 4.79% | 2.70% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JBBB and RAAA have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, RAAA is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
RAAA is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.
JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.13%, compared with 4.79% for RAAA.
They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and Reckoner. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JBBB and 0.30% for RAAA.
Find the right allocation for JBBB and RAAA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer