JBBB vs. MINT

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

JBBB (Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF) and MINT (PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JBBB is a CLO fund actively managed by Janus Henderson, while MINT is a Ultrashort Bond fund actively managed by PIMCO. Both are actively managed. Over the past 3 years, JBBB returned 10.46%/yr vs 5.40%/yr for MINT. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JBBB charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for MINT.

Performance

JBBB vs. MINT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with JBBB having a 2.03% return and MINT slightly lower at 1.94%.

JBBB

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: 0.71%
• YTD: 2.03%
• 6M: 2.43%
• 1Y: 5.67%
• 3Y*: 10.46%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MINT

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.35%
• YTD: 1.94%
• 6M: 2.19%
• 1Y: 4.67%
• 3Y*: 5.40%
• 5Y*: 3.49%
• 10Y*: 2.72%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBBB vs. MINT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF	2.03%	5.43%	12.50%	17.63%	-5.88%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	1.94%	4.74%	5.94%	6.26%	-0.90%

Correlation

The correlation between JBBB and MINT is 0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.01
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.07
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 12, 2022	0.11

The correlation between JBBB and MINT shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (1 year) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

JBBB vs. MINT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBBB

JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 56
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 62
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 64
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 50
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 51

MINT

MINT Risk / Return Rank: 100
MINT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Sortino Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Omega Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MINT Martin Ratio Rank: 100

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBBB vs. MINT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	JBBB	MINT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.58	17.51	-15.93
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.52	66.94	-64.42
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.34	21.62	-20.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.21	95.35	-93.14
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	7.50	965.15	-957.65

JBBB vs. MINT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is lower than the MINT Sharpe Ratio of 17.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBBB and MINT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

JBBB vs. MINT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, which is greater than MINT's maximum drawdown of -4.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and MINT.

Drawdown Indicators

	JBBB	MINT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.57%	-4.62%	-5.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.46%	-0.05%	-2.41%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-3.82%	-0.16%	-3.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-2.42%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-4.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.57%	-0.17%	-1.40%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.72%	0.00%	+0.72%

Volatility

JBBB vs. MINT - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) has a higher volatility of 1.02% compared to PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF (MINT) at 0.09%. This indicates that JBBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MINT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JBBB	MINT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.02%	0.09%	+0.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.90%	0.20%	+2.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.45%	0.27%	+3.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.26%	0.58%	+4.68%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.26%	0.95%	+4.31%

JBBB vs. MINT - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MINT's 0.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

JBBB vs. MINT - Dividend Comparison

JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, more than MINT's 4.28% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
JBBB Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF	7.11%	8.41%	9.24%	8.71%	5.71%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MINT PIMCO Enhanced Short Maturity Active ETF	4.28%	4.63%	5.22%	4.91%	1.90%	0.44%	1.15%	2.65%	2.32%	1.61%	1.35%	0.88%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JBBB and MINT in my portfolio?

JBBB and MINT have a correlation of 0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JBBB or MINT?

JBBB has higher volatility (1.02%) compared to MINT (0.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBBB dropped -10.57% vs MINT's -4.62%.

Which ETF is better, JBBB or MINT?

On 3-year performance, JBBB leads with 10.46% vs 5.40% for MINT. On fees, MINT is cheaper at 0.36% per year. On volatility, MINT has been the lower-risk option at 0.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JBBB or MINT?

Over the 3-year period, JBBB has performed better with a 10.46% return vs 5.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JBBB or MINT?

MINT is cheaper with a 0.36% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for JBBB.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JBBB or MINT?

JBBB has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 4.28% for MINT.

What is the main difference between JBBB and MINT?

JBBB is categorized as CLO, while MINT is Ultrashort Bond. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and PIMCO. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JBBB and 0.36% for MINT.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MINT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.51 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.