PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBBB vs. MBSF
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

JBBB vs. MBSF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

JBBB vs. MBSF - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
-0.18%5.43%10.68%
MBSF
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
0.75%5.85%5.71%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a -0.18% return, which is significantly lower than MBSF's 0.75% return.


JBBB

1D
0.63%
1M
1.10%
YTD
-0.18%
6M
1.19%
1Y
4.26%
3Y*
11.06%
5Y*
10Y*

MBSF

1D
0.31%
1M
-0.13%
YTD
0.75%
6M
2.41%
1Y
5.20%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


JBBB vs. MBSF - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both JBBB and MBSF have an expense ratio of 0.49%.


Return for Risk

JBBB vs. MBSF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 4747
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 4141
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

MBSF
MBSF Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
MBSF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8383
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBSF Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBSF Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
MBSF Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBSF Martin Ratio Rank: 9696
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBBB vs. MBSF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


JBBBMBSFDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.85

1.69

-0.84

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.22

2.61

-1.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.31

-0.11

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.30

6.70

-5.39

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.29

19.07

-13.78

JBBB vs. MBSF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBBB Sharpe Ratio is 0.85, which is lower than the MBSF Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBBB and MBSF, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


JBBBMBSFDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.85

1.69

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.24

1.74

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between JBBB and MBSF is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

JBBB vs. MBSF - Dividend Comparison

JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.65%, more than MBSF's 4.63% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
7.65%8.41%9.24%8.71%5.71%
MBSF
Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF
4.63%4.71%4.14%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

JBBB vs. MBSF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, which is greater than MBSF's maximum drawdown of -0.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and MBSF.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


JBBBMBSFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-0.97%

-9.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.45%

-0.79%

-2.66%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.39%

-0.48%

-0.91%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.62%

-0.23%

-1.39%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.86%

0.28%

+0.58%

Volatility

JBBB vs. MBSF - Volatility Comparison

Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) has a higher volatility of 2.05% compared to Regan Floating Rate MBS ETF (MBSF) at 1.42%. This indicates that JBBB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBSF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


JBBBMBSFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.05%

1.42%

+0.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.67%

2.29%

+0.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

5.07%

3.09%

+1.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.33%

3.42%

+1.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.33%

3.42%

+1.91%