PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
JBBB vs. GDXY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

JBBB vs. GDXY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JBBB achieves a 2.03% return, which is significantly higher than GDXY's -12.32% return.


JBBB

1D
0.15%
1M
0.52%
YTD
2.03%
6M
2.43%
1Y
5.67%
3Y*
10.46%
5Y*
10Y*

GDXY

1D
2.43%
1M
-14.26%
YTD
-12.32%
6M
-11.68%
1Y
20.95%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JBBB vs. GDXY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
2.03%5.43%7.44%
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
-12.32%88.08%-11.84%

Correlation

The correlation between JBBB and GDXY is 0.29, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 21, 2024

0.16

The correlation between JBBB and GDXY shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.29 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

JBBB vs. GDXY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JBBB
JBBB Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
JBBB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5252
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JBBB Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
JBBB Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
JBBB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5050
Calmar Ratio Rank
JBBB Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

GDXY
GDXY Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
GDXY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDXY Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDXY Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
GDXY Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDXY Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JBBB vs. GDXY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) and YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


JBBBGDXYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.13

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.21

0.65

+1.56

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.50

1.83

+5.67

JBBB vs. GDXY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JBBB Sharpe Ratio is 1.58, which is higher than the GDXY Sharpe Ratio of 0.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JBBB and GDXY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

JBBB vs. GDXY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JBBB drawdown since its inception was -10.57%, smaller than the maximum GDXY drawdown of -34.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JBBB and GDXY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


JBBBGDXYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-10.57%

-34.16%

+23.59%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.46%

-34.16%

+31.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-3.82%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-29.61%

+29.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.57%

-6.72%

+5.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.72%

12.05%

-11.33%

Volatility

JBBB vs. GDXY - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF (JBBB) is 1.02%, while YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF (GDXY) has a volatility of 14.51%. This indicates that JBBB experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDXY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


JBBBGDXYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.02%

14.51%

-13.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.90%

32.60%

-29.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.45%

38.00%

-34.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.26%

32.36%

-27.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.26%

32.36%

-27.10%

JBBB vs. GDXY - Expense Ratio Comparison

JBBB has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GDXY's 0.99% expense ratio.


Dividends

JBBB vs. GDXY - Dividend Comparison

JBBB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.11%, less than GDXY's 82.04% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
GDXY
YieldMax Gold Miners Option Income Strategy ETF
82.04%52.13%23.91%0.00%0.00%
JBBB
Janus Henderson B-BBB CLO ETF
7.11%8.41%9.24%8.71%5.71%

Frequently Asked Questions


JBBB and GDXY have a correlation of 0.29, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GDXY has higher volatility (14.51%) compared to JBBB (1.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JBBB dropped -10.57% vs GDXY's -34.16%.

On 1-year performance, GDXY leads with 20.95% vs 5.67% for JBBB. On fees, JBBB is cheaper at 0.49% per year. On volatility, JBBB has been the lower-risk option at 1.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, GDXY has performed better with a 20.95% return vs 5.67%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JBBB is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for GDXY.

GDXY has the higher dividend yield at 82.04%, compared with 7.11% for JBBB.

JBBB is categorized as CLO, while GDXY is Derivative Income. They also come from different issuers: Janus Henderson and YieldMax. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for JBBB and 0.99% for GDXY.

JBBB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.58 vs 0.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for JBBB and GDXY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer