JAVA vs. JQUA
JAVA (JPMorgan Active Value ETF) and JQUA (JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JAVA is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JQUA is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the JP Morgan US Quality Factor Index. JAVA is actively managed, while JQUA is passively managed. Over the past 3 years, JAVA returned 16.85%/yr vs 20.64%/yr for JQUA. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. JAVA charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for JQUA.
Performance
JAVA vs. JQUA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, JAVA achieves a 9.58% return, which is significantly lower than JQUA's 14.16% return.
JAVA
- 1D
- 0.99%
- 1M
- 3.08%
- YTD
- 9.58%
- 6M
- 10.30%
- 1Y
- 25.44%
- 3Y*
- 16.85%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JQUA
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- 7.20%
- YTD
- 14.16%
- 6M
- 14.37%
- 1Y
- 22.69%
- 3Y*
- 20.64%
- 5Y*
- 13.92%
- 10Y*
- —
JAVA vs. JQUA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF | 9.58% | 14.92% | 15.52% | 10.46% | -0.88% | 5.23% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 14.16% | 11.69% | 21.21% | 25.13% | -13.45% | 11.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between JAVA and JQUA is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021 | 0.85 |
The correlation between JAVA and JQUA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.80 to 0.85 - a consistent structural relationship.
JAVA vs. JQUA - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
JAVA
JQUA
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
Utilities
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Financial Services
JAVA
JQUA
Technology
JAVA
JQUA
Industrials
JAVA
JQUA
Healthcare
JAVA
JQUA
Consumer Cyclical
JAVA
JQUA
Communication Services
JAVA
JQUA
Energy
JAVA
JQUA
Consumer Defensive
JAVA
JQUA
Utilities
JAVA
JQUA
Basic Materials
JAVA
JQUA
Real Estate
JAVA
JQUA
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
JAVA vs. JQUA — Risk / Return Rank
JAVA
JQUA
JAVA vs. JQUA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| JAVA | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.25 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.40 | 1.35 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.08 | 3.20 | -0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.37 | 13.48 | -2.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| JAVA | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.28 | 2.03 | +0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.80 | 0.83 | -0.04 |
Drawdowns
JAVA vs. JQUA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum JAVA drawdown since its inception was -16.54%, smaller than the maximum JQUA drawdown of -32.92%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAVA and JQUA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| JAVA | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -16.54% | -32.92% | +16.38% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.29% | -7.13% | -1.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -16.54% | -16.81% | +0.27% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -22.47% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -0.28% | +0.28% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.63% | -4.16% | +0.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.24% | 1.69% | +0.55% |
Volatility
JAVA vs. JQUA - Volatility Comparison
JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF (JQUA) have volatilities of 2.70% and 2.82%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| JAVA | JQUA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.70% | 2.82% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.45% | 8.31% | +0.14% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 11.20% | 11.20% | 0.00% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 15.61% | -0.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.80% | 17.99% | -3.19% |
JAVA vs. JQUA - Expense Ratio Comparison
JAVA has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than JQUA's 0.12% expense ratio.
Dividends
JAVA vs. JQUA - Dividend Comparison
JAVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.24%, more than JQUA's 1.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF | 1.24% | 1.34% | 1.45% | 1.65% | 1.25% | 0.48% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
JQUA JPMorgan U.S. Quality Factor ETF | 1.07% | 1.19% | 1.24% | 1.21% | 1.60% | 1.32% | 1.44% | 1.67% | 2.10% | 0.40% |
Frequently Asked Questions
JAVA and JQUA have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
JQUA has higher volatility (2.82%) compared to JAVA (2.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAVA dropped -16.54% vs JQUA's -32.92%.
On 3-year performance, JQUA leads with 20.64% vs 16.85% for JAVA. On fees, JQUA is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, JAVA has been the lower-risk option at 2.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, JQUA has performed better with a 20.64% return vs 16.85%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JQUA is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JAVA.
JAVA has the higher dividend yield at 1.24%, compared with 1.07% for JQUA.
JAVA is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JQUA is Large Cap Growth Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JAVA and 0.12% for JQUA.
JAVA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for JAVA and JQUA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer