JAVA vs. JPLD

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

JAVA (JPMorgan Active Value ETF) and JPLD (J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - JAVA is a Large Cap Value Equities fund actively managed by JPMorgan, while JPLD is a Short-Term Bond fund actively managed by JPMorgan. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, JAVA returned 23.95% vs 4.71% for JPLD. At a 0.12 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. JAVA charges 0.44%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for JPLD.

Performance

JAVA vs. JPLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, JAVA achieves a 8.50% return, which is significantly higher than JPLD's 1.04% return.

JAVA

• 1D: -0.21%
• 1M: 2.70%
• YTD: 8.50%
• 6M: 9.14%
• 1Y: 23.95%
• 3Y*: 16.35%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

JPLD

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: 0.19%
• YTD: 1.04%
• 6M: 1.37%
• 1Y: 4.71%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

JAVA vs. JPLD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF	8.50%	14.92%	15.52%	1.98%
JPLD J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF	1.04%	6.01%	6.49%	3.23%

Correlation

The correlation between JAVA and JPLD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.13
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 1, 2023	0.12

JAVA vs. JPLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	JAVA	JPLD
Financial Services	20.1%	13.7%
Technology	15.3%	7.4%
Industrials	13.9%	0.1%
Healthcare	12.5%	5.6%
Consumer Cyclical	8.6%	1.6%
Communication Services	8.4%	10.1%
Energy	5.5%	0.1%
Consumer Defensive	5.0%	0.1%
Utilities	4.1%	0.4%
Basic Materials	3.6%	1.4%
Real Estate	2.9%	7.8%

Return for Risk

JAVA vs. JPLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

JAVA

JAVA Risk / Return Rank: 62
JAVA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
JAVA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
JAVA Omega Ratio Rank: 62
JAVA Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
JAVA Martin Ratio Rank: 60

JPLD

JPLD Risk / Return Rank: 91
JPLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 90
JPLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
JPLD Omega Ratio Rank: 94
JPLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
JPLD Martin Ratio Rank: 90

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

JAVA vs. JPLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) and J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	JAVA	JPLD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.15	3.22	-1.07
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.07	5.29	-2.22
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	1.68	-0.29
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.90	4.71	-1.81
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.71	21.78	-11.08
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

JAVA vs. JPLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current JAVA Sharpe Ratio is 2.15, which is lower than the JPLD Sharpe Ratio of 3.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of JAVA and JPLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	JAVA	JPLD	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.15	3.22	-1.07
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.78	3.25	-2.47

Drawdowns

JAVA vs. JPLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum JAVA drawdown since its inception was -16.54%, which is greater than JPLD's maximum drawdown of -1.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for JAVA and JPLD.

Drawdown Indicators

	JAVA	JPLD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.54%	-1.17%	-15.37%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.29%	-1.00%	-7.29%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-16.54%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.21%	-0.12%	-0.09%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.63%	-0.15%	-3.48%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.24%	0.22%	+2.02%

Volatility

JAVA vs. JPLD - Volatility Comparison

JPMorgan Active Value ETF (JAVA) has a higher volatility of 2.60% compared to J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF (JPLD) at 0.37%. This indicates that JAVA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JPLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	JAVA	JPLD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	2.60%	0.37%	+2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	8.40%	0.97%	+7.43%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.19%	1.47%	+9.72%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	14.80%	1.83%	+12.97%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.80%	1.83%	+12.97%

JAVA vs. JPLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

JAVA has a 0.44% expense ratio, which is higher than JPLD's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

JAVA vs. JPLD - Dividend Comparison

JAVA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, less than JPLD's 4.21% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
JAVA JPMorgan Active Value ETF	1.25%	1.34%	1.45%	1.65%	1.25%	0.48%
JPLD J P Morgan Exchange-Traded Fund Trust - Limited Duration Bond ETF	4.21%	4.24%	4.47%	1.83%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both JAVA and JPLD in my portfolio?

JAVA and JPLD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, JAVA or JPLD?

JAVA has higher volatility (2.60%) compared to JPLD (0.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, JAVA dropped -16.54% vs JPLD's -1.17%.

Which ETF is better, JAVA or JPLD?

On 1-year performance, JAVA leads with 23.95% vs 4.71% for JPLD. On fees, JPLD is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, JPLD has been the lower-risk option at 0.37%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, JAVA or JPLD?

Over the 1-year period, JAVA has performed better with a 23.95% return vs 4.71%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, JAVA or JPLD?

JPLD is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.44% for JAVA.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, JAVA or JPLD?

JPLD has the higher dividend yield at 4.21%, compared with 1.25% for JAVA.

What is the main difference between JAVA and JPLD?

JAVA is categorized as Large Cap Value Equities, while JPLD is Short-Term Bond. Their fees differ too: 0.44% for JAVA and 0.24% for JPLD.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

JPLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.22 vs 2.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.